<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
	xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">

<channel>
<title>DVD Verdict</title>
<link>http://www.dvdverdict.com/</link>
<description>DVD Verdict posts insightful, sometimes irreverent, reviews of films in the DVD format.</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<creator>DVD Verdict</creator>
<copyright>HipClick Designs LLC</copyright>
<sy:updatePeriod>daily</sy:updatePeriod>
<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
<sy:updateBase>2000-01-01T00:00:00</sy:updateBase>
<item>
<title>Baldwin Hills: The Complete First Season</title>
<link>http://www.dvdverdict.com/reviews/baldwinhillsseason1.php</link>
<dc:date>2008-08-28</dc:date>
<dc:contributor>Victor Valdivia</dc:contributor>
<description>
<![CDATA[

<h1>The Charge</h1>
<p>The life of the young, black, and fab.</p>

<h1>The Case</h1>
<p><b>Baldwin Hills: The Complete First Season</b> is really a combination of two shows. One addresses issues of class, race, and stereotypes within the black community. The other is a teen soap about kids, some of whom act like spoiled brats, in an upper-class L.A. suburb. Unfortunately, the needs of good TV mean that the latter is emphasized frequently at the expense of the former. For every interesting insight about black life, the series has at least two scenes of cast members making fools of themselves for the camera. Even when BET claims to make an informative show, the needs of TV reality for loud voices and shocking commotion still take precedence.</p>
<p>The premise of <b>Baldwin Hills</b> is similar to that of other teen reality series such as <b>Laguna Beach</b> and <b>The Hills</b>. Eleven teenagers from the Baldwin Hills suburb and surrounding areas of Los Angeles are filmed as they hang out, form friendships, date, and prepare for graduation. Here are the cast members:</p>
<p>&#8226;&nbsp;Ashley: Aspiring actress, daughter of an actress, and a doctor.<br /> &#8226;&nbsp;Moriah: Son of a basketball star and would-be basketball player<br /> &#8226;&nbsp;Garnette: Self-proclaimed future CEO<br /> &#8226;&nbsp;Roqui: Daughter of a basketball coach who dreams of hosting her own talk show.<br /> &#8226;&nbsp;Sal: A resident of one of the rougher neighborhoods around Baldwin Hills, he hopes of being a rapper.<br /> &#8226;&nbsp;Staci: Sal's childhood friend, smart-tongued and assertive.<br /> &#8226;&nbsp;Gaven: Senior class president of his high school.<br /> &#8226;&nbsp;Jordan: &quot;The Next Diddy,&quot; as he labels himself, who promotes parties at nightclubs.<br /> &#8226;&nbsp;Willie: Arty, gentle hippie who loves photography.<br /> &#8226;&nbsp;Gerren: Already a teen model who has been profiled on <i>Oprah</i><br /> &#8226;&nbsp;Daymeon: Class clown and wannabe comedian.</p>
<p>This two-disc set contains all ten episodes from the first season, and they make clear that while the idea behind the show (to examine an aspect of black America that is rarely shown in mainstream TV) is worthy, the execution leaves plenty to be desired. By far the biggest problem is that the cast is just way too big. Eleven cast members (as well as about three or four additional teens, not counting family members) are just too many for a show in which each episode only lasts 22 minutes. For instance, after the first two or three episodes, Gaven, who's smart and likable, disappears completely until a very brief cameo in the last episode. Other teens get storylines that start interestingly and then fade away as the show progresses. Willie, whose story is the most interesting, only gets a brief storyline when she photographs Sal for his album cover, and then is reduced to a sidekick for Garnette. The opening intro, in which each cast member states his or her dream, is promising; still, be warned that we only get to see about half the cast members actually working towards their goals.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, what we do see is a lot of pointless sound and fury. The producers evidently decided early on to position Garnette as the series' mini-Omarosa, and she does her part, coming off as bossy, arrogant, and somewhat humorless. While her tantrums and surliness may have seemed entertaining during filming, they quickly become tiresome and even dull as the series wears on. She must actually have some good qualities for her to be seen with such a wide circle of friends, but they're never shown, and once we get the point about how much of a diva she is, she becomes a bore. Similarly, way too much time is spent on Daymeon's attempts at being a stand-up comic. One episode spends several minutes on Daymeon's routine at an open mic night at a comedy club, but within seconds it becomes apparent how appallingly untalented he is. His routine, involving jokes about anal bleeding and why dark-skinned blacks are not as smart as light-skinned blacks (even though he himself is dark-skinned) is thunderously unfunny, yet the show includes every last excruciating minute of it. Yes, his crude and dreadful routine makes for train-wreck TV, but it would have been better to show more of the other neglected cast members instead.</p>
<p><b>Baldwin Hills</b>' failures are all the more disappointing because on occasion the show does tell some interesting truths about black culture. In one episode, several of the girls discuss the pros and cons of going to a predominantly black college like Howard versus a more diverse school like USC. This is the sort of discussion that's immensely fascinating, with no real right or wrong answers, just differing perspectives. It's the type of real-life conversation the show should have more of. Similarly, in another episode, Staci launches into a rant against &quot;white black girls,&quot; meaning &quot;black girls who talk white.&quot; Like Daymeon's anti-dark-skinned jokes, this could have served as an interesting jumping-off point for discussions of racial divisions within the black community itself. Instead, the show just dumps this venomous tirade without any comment, and then cuts away to something unrelated without ever bringing it up again. What's the point of incorporating such controversial ideas if they're not actually going to be debated?</p>
<p>In that regard, some of the DVD extras are more revealing. Not the ones on Disc One, &quot;Ashley's Home Tour&quot; (5:10) and &quot;Hangin' With Sal&quot; (10:12), both of which are just genial puff pieces for viewers who liked those particular cast members. Disc Two, however, contains &quot;Casting Tapes&quot; (26:09), &quot;Cast Interviews&quot; (23:08), and &quot;The Creators&quot; (12:10). The casting tapes consist of the interviews that landed the cast members their slots on the show, and all of the teens, even Garnette and Daymeon, reveal themselves as far more intelligent and self-aware here than on the episodes themselves. On the interviews, the cast members discuss the effects the show has had on their lives and admit that despite what the credits would have viewers believe, several of them didn't know each other before the show. The creators interview the show's producers and directors, who cop to manufacturing several key moments (like asking the cast to invite others to parties) for dramatic purposes. All of which underlines just how much TV-friendly contrivance goes into making a supposedly realistic show like this one. At least the full-screen transfer and stereo mix are satisfactory.</p>
<p>Ultimately, <b>Baldwin Hills: The Complete First Season</b> is hard to recommend. Even by reality-TV standards, there's just far too much TV and too little reality here. Watch a few episodes on BET if you're curious, but there's not much reason to buy this set. Someday someone will make a truly insightful show about upper middle-class black life in America, but <b>Baldwin Hills</b> simply isn't it. Guilty.</p>
]]>
</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Bra Boys</title>
<link>http://www.dvdverdict.com/reviews/braboys.php</link>
<dc:date>2008-08-28</dc:date>
<dc:contributor>Adam Arseneau</dc:contributor>
<description>
<![CDATA[

<h1>The Charge</h1>
<p>A documentary film about respect, surfing, loyalty, brotherhood, and murder.</p>

<h1>Opening Statement</h1>
<p>Four out of the five descriptors listed in the tag line above for <b>Bra Boys</b> are excellent and make for an enjoyable documentary about surfing and the cultural evolution of beach gangs in Australia. One of them fails to excite, and it might not be the one you expected.</p>

<h1>Facts of the Case</h1>
<p>In Maroubra, a low-class beach suburb of Sydney rife with social housing, crime, and poverty, the surfing lifestyle is the only thing that keeps young boys on the so-called straight-and-narrow. Beach gangs, formed out of necessity rather than any desire to perform misdeeds, become the adopted family group for outcasts, misfits, runaways, and troublemakers who need a place to call home. Surfing is the alternative to a life of crime or drugs for most of these troubled teens, and those who embrace the lifestyle do it with manic passion, making these Aussie surfers some of the most notoriously brave and daring, almost suicidal. They drink, they party, they surf the hell out of every wave that washes ashore, and they get into good ol' fashioned knuckledusters with rival beach gangs. They are the Bra Boys, and they embrace life hard and fast.</p>
<p>The film centers on the lives of four Bra Boys in particular, Sunny, Koby, Jai, and Dakota Abberton, brothers all. The most well-known of the four is Koby Abberton, a world-class professional surfer whose career was almost sidelined due to the legal problems of his brother, Jai. <b>Bra Boys</b>, created by brother Sunny, takes viewers behind-the-scenes into the lives of his brothers as they try to survive a horrendous ordeal that threatens to crash all of their lives into the rocks.</p>

<h1>The Evidence</h1>
<p>Narrated by Russell Crowe (of all people), <b>Bra Boys</b> takes viewers on a crash-course history lesson into the tumultuous history of Australia, effectively making the point that history has been unkind to those who opt to play in the sun and ride waves all day. When the English showed up on the island back in the 1800s and found the natives there doing exactly that, they pretty much put a genocidal end to that. Flash forward a good hundred or two hundred years later and not much progress has been made. Despite the allure and appeal that a surfing lifestyle might have to us overseas, in Australia, surfers are the lowest of the low -- the bottom-rung of society, harassed and mistreated by the authorities and condemned for their bohemian lifestyle.</p>
<p>'Tis an admittedly compelling little tale told, especially to those of us not environmentally blessed to be born and raised down under. Despite constant clashes with police and being stigmatized in the media as being violent, groups like the Bra Boys come off surprisingly soft and sympathetic here, shown as a caring support group of friends who pledge to become the family support system that they all lacked in their lives. Bear in mind that this is a film made by the Bra Boys about the Bra Boys, so some manner of bias is no doubt inevitable. Still, one cannot deny the odd appeal and admiration towards these young men from circumstance who have carved out an entire world for themselves on the beaches. Like most &quot;gangs&quot; in the United States, most youth involvement stems from necessity and/or poor home lives, but unlike our home-grown gangs, beach gangs seem oddly benign, occasionally getting into fistfights with rival groups, but usually content to drink, surf, and act like louts -- hardly the bustling criminal organization that the Australian press and police make them out to be.</p>
<p>Well, except for the whole murder thing. Acts Two and Three of <b>Bra Boys</b> focus on the legal problems of two Abberton brothers, Jai and Koby, who get charged with the murder of a standover man in the neighborhood. This part of the film is more problematic, but more on that later.</p>
<p><b>Bra Boys</b> is the epitome of independent documentary filmmaking, bearing all the telltale signs of someone whipping this film up on a home computer. Not that there's anything wrong with that -- I say good for them! Just make sure your audiophile expectations are set accordingly. The letterbox transfer is pretty weak, rife with compression artifacts, murky source material, and pixilated footage from cheap digital cameras (some of the video footage looks like it got scooped up directly from YouTube) but again, home computer. As for sound, it is nice to see a full surround presentation here, but the mix gets wasted on the material. The audio is thin and hollow, voices have a mechanical undertone, and the surround mix exhibits an almost random use of rear channels. The music is mixed so low you can barely hear it.</p>
<p>Nothing in the way of extras, which is a shame. I would have liked to see more behind-the-scenes shenanigans. By the looks of the Boys, these guys seriously know how to party.</p>

<h1>The Rebuttal Witnesses</h1>
<p>There are two separate films in <b>Bra Boys</b>, and unfortunately, one is far more interesting than the other. The first third of the film has structure and message, telling a fantastic tale about the surfer culture in Australia, the rise of beach gangs, clashes with authority, the surprisingly tender social system devised to support and help out fellow brothers, and so on. The last two-thirds of the film dissect the legal trouble of Jai and Koby Abberton from the fisheye view of their brother Sunny. As documentaries go, objectivity goes right out the window. <b>Bra Boys</b> feels more like hijacked home videos edited together than a film with any kind of point or message behind it; or worse, like watching a made-for-television courtroom drama where the outcome is never once in doubt.</p>
<p>Frankly, <b>Bra Boys</b> would have been a much better film had it focused more on the boys as a group, and less on the trials and tribulations of the Abbertons. A full examination of the subculture that gave rise to this sort of community would be a fascinating film indeed.</p>

<h1>Closing Statement</h1>
<p><b>Bra Boys</b> is an entertaining and informative documentary despite being a little too close to its subject matter for the sake of objectivity. A bit on the uneven side, too much of the film feels like a boring courtroom drama, but it's hard to find fault with the endlessly impressive surfing shots of insane kids riding the most unbelievably suicidal waves. The parts that are good tip the scales of justice into <b>Bra Boys</b>'s favor.</p>

<h1>The Verdict</h1>
<p>Not guilty. Not bad for a rental.</p>
]]>
</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>The Case Of The Grinning Cat</title>
<link>http://www.dvdverdict.com/reviews/casegrinningcat.php</link>
<dc:date>2008-08-28</dc:date>
<dc:contributor>Daryl Loomis</dc:contributor>
<description>
<![CDATA[

<h1>The Charge</h1>
<p>It is a great asset in life, not to know what you're talking about.</p>

<h1>The Case</h1>
<p>In Paris at the end of 2001, people began to notice a grinning yellow cat appearing in odd places all around the city. While not a physical manifestation of Lewis Carroll's Cheshire Cat, this huge feline caricature stared out over the city from the tops of skyscrapers and the sides of buildings, almost anywhere and in all sizes. How did they appear so suddenly and, more important, what do they mean? With this mystery as his basis, acclaimed documentarian/film essayist Chris Marker (<b>La Jet&#233;e</b>) explores the changes in culture and politics of a post-9/11 Paris.</p>
<p>Using the montages, mixed media, and freely associated imagery on which he has built his reputation, Marker takes us to the streets to see the people whom the cat stares down on. Solving the mystery of the cat is much less important to Marker than understanding what the cat meant to a rapidly changing and discontented populous...if anything at all. His explorations take us from the streets and into the m&#233;tro to show people living their day to day lives, unaware that they live under a specter of fear instilled by their own government. Is this cat meant to represent a government that smiles at its people, tells them everything's alright, but with oppression (in the name of national security) squarely on its mind? On the contrary, it seems closer to representing the antithesis. Taking a cue the 1968 French protest slogan, &quot;Poetry is in the street,&quot; this cat never says that anything is alright; only that art and esthetics are political statements unto themselves.</p>
<p>Marker, however, is too digressive to give us a satisfactory answer to the question, and that's a good thing. The ambiguousness allows him to look more closely at the new left of French activism, and he's bemused to find a politic of posturing in response to an increasingly right-leaning state instead of a politic of people looking for real change. In this way, <b>The Case of the Grinning Cat</b> is an oblique sequel to Marker's fabulous documentary, <b>A Grin Without a Cat</b>, in which he examined the fall of old Leftist politics on a broader world scale. Here, in the confines of the Paris streets, he can focus on the specific tension of the post-9/11 world and how, the day after the attacks, French papers read, &quot;We are all Americans,&quot; but after a mere few weeks, America had become the villain. Marker explores the issues without giving resolution and, like the mysterious cat, is another jumping off points for new questions. Marker is entirely successful with <b>The Case of the Grinning Cat</b>. Now in his '80s, Marker keeps a whimsical distance from his subject, using humor to make his point as much as protest footage. He's at his absurd best when he mattes the cat into paintings from cave dwellings all the way through to Van Gogh, all the while talking about the grinning cat as pervasive throughout human history.</p>
<p>First Run Features has done an excellent job with their DVD of <b>The Case of the Grinning Cat</b>. Marker's imagery is often done using mixed-media and, as a result, the image is just as mixed. There are no transfer errors, but the picture quality is only fair. Neither is the sound anything to write home about. It is in stereo and very clear, but dynamic sound isn't really necessary here. The best part of the release, better than the feature itself, is a collection of Marker's short films that focus on animals. A pair features Marker's own cat, one in which he's laying on a keyboard listening to a sonata and another, called &quot;Leila Attacks,&quot; about a mouse scaring a cat. A &quot;bestiary&quot; is next, with five films ranging from owls to an elephant doing a tango to an &quot;Okinawa Bullfight,&quot; in which the bulls fight each other instead of people. Lastly, in an absolutely heartbreaking piece of cinema, is the 17 minute &quot;Three Cheers for the Whales,&quot; which discusses the history of whaling for food and, later, for sport and profit. Violent and sad, there are images in this short that I will never forget. I recommend the disc for this film alone, but <b>The Case of the Grinning Cat</b> is an excellent, if often obscure, film essay that shows Chris Marker in his winter years as strong as he's ever been.</p>
<p>Not guilty; case closed.<br /></p>
]]>
</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Chicago 10</title>
<link>http://www.dvdverdict.com/reviews/chicago10.php</link>
<dc:date>2008-08-28</dc:date>
<dc:contributor>Ben Saylor</dc:contributor>
<description>
<![CDATA[

<h1>The Charge</h1>
<p>The convention was drama. The trial was comedy.</p>

<h1>The Case</h1>
<p>As the 2008 Democratic National Convention unfolds, comparisons to its 1968 predecessor are inevitable, and, as it would seem, encouraged, at least by Paramount Home Video, which is releasing the 2007 film <b>Chicago 10</b> on DVD this week. While both conventions took (and take) place against a backdrop of vastly unpopular wars, and each occurred amid lame duck presidencies (the 1968 situation being the result of President Lyndon Johnson's decision not to seek another term), the 1968 convention will be forever known for the violence that wracked it. The demonstrations/riots and subsequent conspiracy trial of several protest group leaders (among them Abbie Hoffman, Jerry Rubin, and Black Panther co-founder Bobby Seale) are the subjects of Brett Morgen's film.</p>
<p><b>Chicago 10</b> is a blend of archival news footage of the people and the protests as well as animated scenes of the trial of those who would later be referred to as, alternately, the &quot;Chicago 7&quot; and the &quot;Chicago 8.&quot; (Morgen's inclusion of defense attorneys William Kunstler and Leonard Weinglass brings his total to 10.) Employing what resembles a cruder variation on the rotoscoping technique used much more effectively in Richard Linklater's <b>A Scanner Darkly</b>, Morgen uses what the film claims are actual court transcripts in order to construct the trial's narrative.</p>
<p>Morgen's juxtaposition of the real footage and staged animation generally works well, and clearly conveys both the disastrous nature of the demonstrations as well as the patent absurdity that was the trial. Unfortunately, like Morgen's previous film, the admittedly entertaining Robert Evans propaganda piece <b>The Kid Stays in the Picture</b> (co-directed by <b>American Teen</b> helmer Nanette Burstein), the director's focus is disappointingly narrow. Instead of exploring in greater detail not only the events that preceded the 1968 convention (the assassinations of Martin Luther King and Robert Kennedy, for example) but also its aftermath (Nixon's victory in the general election), Morgen doggedly keeps his focus primarily on Hoffman and the rest of the defendants. Footage of LBJ announcing an escalation of the draft is included, but nothing is made of his momentous decision not to seek reelection and how that affected the Democratic Party heading into the convention. Hubert Humphrey, who ultimately won the nomination over Eugene McCarthy and George McGovern, is a nonentity as far as this film is concerned. I realize that the trial itself is the more overtly iconic and &quot;entertaining&quot; facet of the 1968 convention, but ignoring important historical context really limits the film's impact.</p>
<p>Another problem with Morgen's approach lies with the film's animation, which, while admittedly a unique artistic decision, may prove distracting to some viewers (as it did for me after a while). If the bizarre-looking animated figures don't distract you, the parade of celebrity voices might; Nick Nolte (as prosecutor Tom Foran) is one of the worst offenders in this regard. Hank Azaria (<b>Heat</b>), similarly, is only somewhat effective as Hoffman. Better are Liev Schreiber (<b>The Sum of All Fears</b>) as Kuntsler and the late Roy Scheider as the crabby Judge Julius Hoffman, as well as Jeffrey Wright (<b>Syriana</b>) as Seale.</p>
<p>Paramount Home Video has done <b>Chicago 10</b> a great disservice with its DVD presentation. The image quality is actually pretty strong given its use of different footage of varying quality, and the sound presentation is adequate. The &quot;extras,&quot; however, consist of a collection of previews for titles such as <b>Son of Rambow</b>, <b>Shine a Light</b>, and <b>The Kite Runner</b>, as well as a short clip made by Gina/Gine Telaroli (the DVD sloppily lists one spelling on the case and another on the disc) as part of some contest held in association with the film. It's basically a trailer, which I guess is Paramount's way of making up for not including an actual trailer with the disc. Other than that, there's nothing, not even chapter selections (which, to be fair, may have been an artistic call made by Morgen). Paramount really could have helped compensate for what Morgen leaves out by including valuable, history-minded supplements. Oh well.</p>
<p>Overall, while I'd be lying if I said I didn't come away from <b>Chicago 10</b> not only entertained but also better informed about what happened during and after the 1968 Democratic National Convention, I can't help but be disappointed in the film's lack of scope and deeper insight. The film itself is not guilty (I won't go down in Verdict history as the judge who found the Chicago 10 guilty once again), but Morgen is ordered to head to a library to read up on his history of the late 1960s, and Paramount is admonished for their brutality toward this DVD.</p>
]]>
</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>EliteXC: Street Certified</title>
<link>http://www.dvdverdict.com/reviews/elitexccertified.php</link>
<dc:date>2008-08-28</dc:date>
<dc:contributor>Ian Visser</dc:contributor>
<description>
<![CDATA[

<h1>The Charge</h1>
<p>Cage tested. Street certified.</p>

<h1>The Case</h1>
<p>When you're the big dog, it's inevitable that other puppies will fight you for scraps. After several years at the top of the mixed-martial arts (MMA) industry, the behemoth that is the UFC is being challenged by new and expanding fight organizations eager to get a piece of the riches that the sport has been generating.</p>
<p>Among these challengers to the throne is EliteXC. Created by blending an existing MMA promoter (ProElite) with CBS subsidiary Showtime, the company promotes live events broadcast on Showtime and Showtime PPV. Seeking to bring its fights to a more mainstream audience, EliteXC recently reached an agreement with CBS to show EliteXC events on prime time television.</p>
<p>EliteXC's latest DVD release is <b>EliteXC: Street Certified</b>. Fights featured on the disk include:</p>
<p><i><br /> &quot;Huntington Beach Bad Ass&quot; David &quot;Tank&quot; Abbott vs. Kimbo Slice<br /> Antonio &quot;Big Foot&quot; Silva vs. Ricco Rodriguez<br /> Scott &quot;Hands of Steel&quot; Smith vs. Kyle Noke<br /> James &quot;The Colossus&quot; Thompson vs. Brett Rogers<br /> Yves Edwards vs. Edson Berto<br /> </i></p>
<p>The main draw on this two-disk collection is the fight between &quot;Huntington Beach Bad Ass&quot; David &quot;Tank&quot; Abbott (I do admire any man who demands <i>two</i> nicknames) and Kimbo Slice. Slice has become notorious via online videos portraying his brutal street fights, and is either the second-coming for MMA or is the biggest joke going, depending on your view. Abbott, while considered a veteran when compared to Slice, is no master of finesse himself; his technique largely consists of throwing haymakers as fast and as hard as possible before he keels over from exhaustion.</p>
<p>The problem with hyping this fight the way EliteXC did is that it's over in less than a minute, and as entertainment and sport alike, the match is disappointing. While this fight did get Slice a professional win, nobody could convince themselves that it represents a victory over a skilled, top-notch opponent. I suppose it would be inaccurate to suggest that MMA fans <i>don't</i> the idea of two big men pounding away on each other, but they still don't want to spend forty bucks on a pay-per-view event that doesn't deliver the goods, either.</p>
<p>I'm glad I didn't buy into the hype of this match and cough up any dough. Of the nearly two hours that make up the broadcast portion of the DVD, just twenty-six minutes are given to actual combat, and fifteen of those minutes are in one fight. Only the Silvio/Rodriquez fight manages to last the full three rounds, while the others are over in a matter of minutes. The Edwards/Berto match manages to generate a little heat with the aggressive tactics being displayed, but the remaining fights are dull efforts, leaving little to be remembered by viewers. It's obvious that EliteXC still has a long way to go in assembling the kind of top-notch fighters that can be found in the UFC.</p>
<p>Also troubling is how EliteXC seems intent on providing viewers with a traditional standing slugfest, rather than a match featuring a mix of techniques. The first &quot;M&quot; in MMA is for &quot;mixed,&quot; but the referees tend to force the combatants to stand after only a couple of minutes of ground work. Admittedly I am a &quot;ground and pound&quot; kind of guy, but this unwillingness to allow the fighters to use their ground skills makes this more of a boxing match with an occasional knee strike than a true MMA event (it's telling that none of the featured matches ends in a submission).</p>
<p>For extras, viewers get six fights that were not featured during the original broadcast of the event. These matches include:</p>
<p><i><br /> Rafael Feijao vs. John Doyle<br /> Moyses Gabin vs. Jirka Hilvati<br /> Lorenzo Borgameo vs. Mike Bernhard<br /> Eric Bradley vs. Mikey Gomez<br /> Mario &quot;The Big Hurt&quot; Rinaldi vs. Dave &quot;Pee Wee&quot; Herman<br /> Jon Kirk vs. Yosmany Cabezas<br /> </i></p>
<p>The bonus matches are the real treat of this release; almost every contest is superior to the main event fights in terms of quality and action. Undercard combatants tend to be less-experienced, but considering the yawn-inducing offerings presented in the broadcast, you'd be better off skipping the veterans and spending your time watching this collection of aggressive fighters instead.</p>
<p>In addition to the bonus matches, there is a selection of additional features, including behind-the-scenes segments, fighter bios, photo galleries, a glossary of fight terms, a list of rules, and a Kimbo Slice sticker. The behind-the-scenes section is the meat of the additional features, and includes interviews with fighters, training profiles, weigh-in footage, post-fight press conferences, and commercials for the event. It's not terribly deep, but it is more than the average MMA release includes.</p>
<p>Judging by what is on display in <b>EliteXC: Street Certified</b>, EliteXC has managed to get its hands on some decent funding. Production values don't quite match those of the UFC, but they come pretty close. The camera work is solid, graphics are well-assembled, and the event avoids the cheap feel that many other upstart MMA companies tend to have (bodogFight, I am looking at you). The 1.78:1 widescreen image is decent, with only a few instances of smudging on brighter examples of yellows and reds.</p>
<p><b>EliteXC: Street Certified</b> isn't a bad release, but it isn't a crucial one either. Kimbo Slice fans may want to add this to their collection for completions sake, but the mediocre nature of the main event matches makes it unlikely that MMA fans will find much value here.</p>
<p>Guilty. The courts orders EliteXC to reduce the hype and up the fight quality.</p>
]]>
</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>The Passion Of The Mao</title>
<link>http://www.dvdverdict.com/reviews/passionmao.php</link>
<dc:date>2008-08-28</dc:date>
<dc:contributor>Bill Gibron</dc:contributor>
<description>
<![CDATA[

<h1>The Charge</h1>
<p>Who Knew That Communism Could Be So Funny?</p>

<h1>The Case</h1>
<p>Chairman Mao, the mythic Mao Zedong. The reason Nixon earned access to China and the man who moved his Asian nation away from Russia and into the modern world. Of course, there were some issues along the way, many caused by his own ambitions and aims, but when you consider the inherent illiteracy and indifference of his fellow countrymen, his missteps remain relatively easy to understand. But more than any other leader, Mao radicalized China in a way that would have lasting international effects. Today, the burgeoning superpower owes most of its pro-Capitalist components to a man who believed that supporting his people, not suppressing them, would give rise to contentment and strong governmental continuity -- and if it kept him and his cronies in power, all the better. Still, for many, Mao remains the enemy, a crazed Communist taking a billion citizens to the brink of global confrontation. According to the documentary <b>The Passion of the Mao</b>, not only is he misunderstood, but he just might be a model for future autocrats to follow.</p>
<p>Foisting itself off on audiences under the guise of a smart, subversive Commie Party parody, <b>The Passion of the Mao</b> is actually a well-planned apology for the infamous Chinese leader. The link to Mel Gibson's filleted Jesus epic is specious at best, and when filmmaker Lee Feigon tosses in the occasional lifted riff, it sticks out like forty false pieces of silver. So comedy is one of the last entertainment vestiges you will find here. If, on the other hand, you want a rather detailed history of the accomplishments and philosophies of the noted world leader, this is a great place to start. In a kooky <i>Classics Illustrated</i> fashion, Feigon follows Mao's rise from student to businessman, failed radical to challenger of the entire Chinese government. In between, we get snippets from the infamous <i>Little Red Book</i>, glimpses of archival footage, Video Toaster-level animation, and enough artificial irreverence to hide a simple, singular truth. Feigon clearly likes what Mao accomplished for his country, dragging it out of its agrarian roots and into the twentieth century. The how and horrors within get relatively shortchanged, however.</p>
<p>Mao was an old man when he came to prominence among '60s counterculture intellectuals, his writings reminiscent of other Asian thinkers -- sans the subtlety or abject eloquence. <b>Passion</b> takes us back to the days when the leader was a womanizing, power-hungry novice, his battles with Russia and his own people provoking a desire to usurp those determined to use control as a means of manipulating the populace. Mao's greatest achievement, and the facet this film mostly focuses on, was the so-called Cultural Revolution (meshed with the additional Great Leap Forward). These policies returned determination to the citizenry, using borderline democratic means within a communal setting to reduce poverty, increase education...and most importantly, limit opposition and resentment. Mao remains one of the few leaders who understood that a despot is never hated if he appears to be dictating for -- not to -- the masses. With their ability to raise crops, make money, and school their children, the peasant class clamored for the leader, supporting him throughout the roughest of Party purges.</p>
<p>In fact, the most amazing thing one learns from <b>The Passion of the Mao</b> is how resilient he was. It seems like, every time we turn around, there's another Red Army defeat, another internationally supported attempt to overthrow or undermine his influence. Additionally, Mao's rather sad familial situation gets some necessary scrutinizing. He cheated on his wives and mistresses, had several children die (either in infancy, or in the heat of battle), and even abandoned several offspring among the countryside when he and his current companion couldn't care for them. All the while, Feigon does his best Morgan Spurlock -- sans onscreen appearances. The narration by Aaron Freeman is all pith and pomposity, the voiceover artist's sonorous tones never taking anything remotely seriously. Even his reading of Mao's curse word-laden passages comes across as hilariously haughty. Elsewhere, a few talking heads appear, providing personal perspective (and nothing but praise) for the man who remade China. <b>The Passion of the Mao</b> is a decent documentary, considering the amount of history is has to offer. But the satiric perspective never materializes, resulting in a lesson that's light on the laughs it proposes to provide.</p>
<p>From a technical standpoint, this basic DVD from Indie Pictures is decent, if not necessarily flawless. The 1.78:1 anamorphic widescreen image is good, if a tad flat. The colors are clear and the details obvious, but there are moments of stock footage instability and Photoshop sloppiness throughout. Indeed, as a video-to-digital transfer, it's good if slightly underwhelming. Similarly, the Dolby Digital Stereo mix offers nothing but discernible dialogue and easily understood narration. The musical scoring is understated and uninteresting. Sadly, there are no bonus features offered, and in the case of a subject as controversial as Mao, a little outside perspective would have been nice. Still, for what's here, <b>The Passion of the Mao</b> succeeds. It's a minor movie at best, but within its artistic and historic aims, it does an effective job.</p>
]]>
</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>P.D. James: Devices And Desires</title>
<link>http://www.dvdverdict.com/reviews/pdjamesdesires.php</link>
<dc:date>2008-08-28</dc:date>
<dc:contributor>James A. Stewart</dc:contributor>
<description>
<![CDATA[

<h1>The Charge</h1>
<p>&quot;I tend to believe in an absolute morality, independent of time or circumstance.&quot; -- Adam Dalgleish</p>

<h1>Opening Statement</h1>
<p>P.D. James is a name familiar to mystery fans. Starting with 1962's <i>Cover Her Face</i>, she wrote around a dozen mysteries featuring Commander Adam Dalgleish.</p>
<p>In her own words as seen on her official site, James adapted &quot;an outworn form to produce a contemporary novel which would provide excitement and mystery and yet say something true about contemporary men and women under the trauma of a police investigation.&quot;</p>
<p>Roy Marsden brought numerous Adam Dalgleish stories to life on TV, including <b>P.D. James: Devices and Desires</b>, a six-hour drama for British TV.</p>

<h1>Facts of the Case</h1>
<p>London copper Adam Dalgleish (Roy Marsden, <i>The Sandbaggers</i>), on leave, is settling into life in scenic and rural Norfolk with the help of Meg (Susannah York, <b>A Man For All Seasons</b>), who's catching him up on all the local gossip.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, there's a serial killer known as The Whistler roaming the countryside. The murders first hit home for Dalgleish at a dinner party; one of the guests is late because he stumbled on a body. Naturally, he tells more of what he saw to the assembled guests than is wise.</p>
<p>The case is about to hit home for Dalgleish again: he finds the body of a woman from the nearby nuclear plant after she is killed by an unknown assailant. It looks like The Whistler has struck again, but Dalgleish has his doubts. After all, with her trying to evict a broke widower and his kids from the home she lets, refusing to get out of the life of the boss she slept with, and taking legal action against anti-nuclear activists, there are quite a few suspects -- several of whom now know The Whistler's trademarks.</p>

<h1>The Evidence</h1>
<p><b>Devices and Desires</b> has the feel of a soap opera rather than a gripping thriller. The clues are telegraphed too obviously, with ominous music and meaningful expressions from the actors contributing to the melodramatic atmosphere.</p>
<p>I figured out whose murder would be central to the plot in the first episode. The suspects were lined up neatly in the second, with a couple of them standing out. Thus, when the murder actually took place at the end of the second episode, it was already anticlimactic. I was surprised by a subplot about a possible nuclear disaster which turned up in the last two segments, but it didn't help much.</p>
<p>Roy Marsden's Adam Dalgleish is blandly likeable, giving lifts to the widower's waiflike children and ambling around the countryside with an expression that seems more glum than it should be. Just so you know he's a hero, he wears a leather jacket.</p>
<p>Despite its modern and soap operatic trappings, <b>Devices and Desires</b> has some nods to the cozy mystery, with its rural setting, a detective living in a quaint windmill, and a town full of gossip.</p>
<p>The production has the cheap look that you'd expect from videotape, especially seventeen-year-old videotape. There's flaring and some murky scenes, and the bits where the killer shines a light to hide his face (from the viewers, presumably, since the victims won't be telling anyone) will just hurt your eyes. Scenes shot from the viewpoint of the killer just look cheap and not very scary. If that weren't enough, there's a brief freeze in there.</p>
<p>Oh, and did I mention the extended scene of people standing over the murdered woman's naked body? When stretched out too long, it's not dramatic, just weird.</p>

<h1>The Rebuttal Witnesses</h1>
<p>One of the things you don't have to worry about here is seeing too much cut out. While I didn't go for it, purists and hardcore P.D. James fans might love it.</p>
<p>I'll also note that I watched this one in a couple of marathon sessions, while it was originally shown in six parts on TV. It could play better given a more relaxed time frame.</p>

<h1>Closing Statement</h1>
<p>While I can see the makings of a gripping thriller in P.D. James' story, the TV version of <b>Devices and Desires</b> comes across as dull and drawn out.</p>

<h1>The Verdict</h1>
<p>Guilty of overkill.</p>
]]>
</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>The Royal Diaries</title>
<link>http://www.dvdverdict.com/reviews/royaldiaries.php</link>
<dc:date>2008-08-28</dc:date>
<dc:contributor>Kerry Birmingham</dc:contributor>
<description>
<![CDATA[

<h1>The Charge</h1>
<p>Every princess has a story.</p>

<h1>Opening Statement</h1>
<p>Would most little girls want to grow up to be princesses if they knew it would be anything like this? This series of tween-skewing histories, based on a young adult book series published by Scholastic, recasts several famous rulers of the past as young girls not yet come to power. Narrating from their own fictionalized &quot;diaries&quot; (or, in Cleopatra's case, papyrus), these half-hour vignettes imagine these unknowable women of history as uncertain young people navigating their way through the world, facing both the perils of royalty (infighting, political manipulation, the occasional asp in the bed) and the ordinary perils of growing up (sibling rivalry, parental disapproval, awkward romance). Originally airing in 2000, the three episodes collected here follow the travails of some of history's most famous female rulers before they came to rule, each at ages where a life of power was still largely a life of leisure and battlefields couldn't compete with the teenage wasteland-apparently that's a bad age to be no matter what era you live in.</p>

<h1>Facts of the Case</h1>
<p><b>Elizabeth I: Red Rose of the House of Tudor</b> follows England's young queen (Tamara Hope) in her adolescent years as she attempts to curry favor with her infamously tempestuous father, Henry VIII, and navigate the perils of courtly politics among her squabbling royal siblings.</p>
<p>In <b>Isabel: Jewel of Castilla</b>, the would-be ruler of Spain (Lisa Jakub, <b>Mrs. Doubtfire</b>) is forced to choose between what she believes to be right and her obligations to her family, whose feud has engulfed the country in civil war. Should she go with an arranged marriage that could salvage the kingdom, or follow her own desires?</p>
<p><b>Cleopatra VII: Daughter of the Nile</b> finds the legendary Egyptian queen (Elisa Moolecherry)in her early years, fleeing assassins bent on destroying her father and the royal family. Cleopatra escapes with her father to Rome in a last ditch effort to secure aid for her homeland, only to find her father is not the master negotiator she thought he was and her power-hungry siblings have come to power in Egypt in their absence, leaving her and her own wits to save the empire.</p>

<h1>The Evidence</h1>
<p>This is not the stuff of riveting biography, nor does it aim to be. <b>The Royal Diaries</b>'s target audience is about the age of its protagonists, and falls squarely into that camp of youth entertainment that-shh!-wants to educate its audience without their even realizing it. Hence we have an uneasy mix of history and melodrama further constrained by the running time of each episode, and the results aren't as magical as the whimsical princess narratives they seem to want to evoke. For the most part, however, each episode is a competently produced summation of a time and place invoked mainly in dusty tomes, and certainly never aimed at young girls.</p>
<p>The order of the day in <b>The Royal Diaries</b> is relatability, history be damned, and it's a refreshing move that puts history second. Do we put Cleopatra's political machinations to the forefront, or her fear for her family? Isabel's convoluted political situation or her desire to marry the right boy? It's reductionist and oversimplified, but a little bit of teen angst makes the history go down: your kids are watching Elizabeth bicker with her sister, Mary, sure, but they're also learning about the English line of succession, Catholic persecution, and exactly how big of a jerk Henry VIII was. Production values are high and the acting is uniformly excellent, particularly Hope's Elizabeth, feisty and shrewd. It's history and life lessons in one concise package, and <b>The Royal Diaries</b> can be forgiven if it favors its &quot;girl power&quot; message over matters of historical import (such as Queen Isabel, who, as a voiceover mentions over a still frame of the smiling queen, later instituted the Spanish Inquisition. Whoops!). The histories here depicted gloss over details, but much of the time those details are beside the point. These are mildly diverting educational tools, and in the quest to get information and a little inspiration, to its target audience, it's okay to only briefly acknowledge the fact that the whole of civilization is pretty damn crazy no matter what age you're living in. Those who do not learn from teenage girls in possession of power are doomed to repeat it.</p>
<p>Picture and sound are nominal throughout. There are no special features to speak of, nor anything as rudimentary as chapter selection or subtitles (which would have come in handy with the many foreign names being bandied about).</p>

<h1>Closing Statement</h1>
<p>History buffs should just move along, in case my use of the words &quot;tweens,&quot; &quot;educational,&quot; and &quot;girl power&quot; didn't tip you off that this is not one for the History Channel crowd. Parents looking to expand their children's horizons, particularly young girls, could do worse than these stories, which make political intrigue and violent reprisals seem like more of a bummer than the grave matters adults know them to be.</p>

<h1>The Verdict</h1>
<p>Not guilty, and no one's to be beheaded, tortured, or otherwise assassinated to figure that out.</p>
]]>
</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Shark Week: Ocean Of Fear</title>
<link>http://www.dvdverdict.com/reviews/sharkweekfear.php</link>
<dc:date>2008-08-28</dc:date>
<dc:contributor>Ian Visser</dc:contributor>
<description>
<![CDATA[

<h1>The Charge</h1>
<p>Live every week like its Shark Week...</p>

<h1>The Case</h1>
<p>For more than two decades the Discovery Channel has held an annual week-long focus on that most-feared of sea creatures: the shark. Hosted in 2008 by &quot;Survivorman&quot; Les Stroud, <b>Shark Week: Ocean of Fear</b> features examinations of sharks and their habits.</p>
<p>Discovery Channel has assembled all six episodes of the 2008 series onto a two-disk set. The shows include:</p>
<p><i>Ocean of Fear: Worst Shark Attack Ever</i><br /> A true-story recounting of the <i>USS Indianapolis</i> in World War Two, when hundreds of men were plunged into the Philippine sea and left to the mercy of the local shark population. The show combines dramatic recreations with survivor testimonies in an attempt to determine why the attack happened and how many men still managed to survive the experience.</p>
<p><i>Perfect Predators</i><br /> How did sharks managed to get to the top of their food chain? Was it evolution or just chance? By studying several species of sharks, their environments and their food, researchers attempt to learn what has made this animal the &quot;perfect killing machine.&quot;</p>
<p><i>Shark Tribe</i><br /> In Papa New Guinea there exists a tribe of people who have hunted sharks for hundreds of years using traditional methods. How do these people manage to survive capturing sharks with just their bare hands and wooden canoes? <b>Rogue Nature<b>host Dave Salmoni and shark scientist Ryan Johnson journey to the wild shores of the island to unlock the secrets of these famed &quot;shark whisperers&quot; and try their hand at the same methods.</p>
<p><i>Top Five Eaten Alive</i><br /> Getting eaten alive by a shark sucks, and this episode shows you why. Through dramatic recreations viewers witness five of the most amazing survivor stories and learn what they can do if ever attacked themselves.</p>
<p><i>Shark Feeding Frenzy</i><br /> Are shark attacks on humans intentional, or simply mistakes? <b>Survivorman</b> host Les Stroud goes underwater with swarms of sharks to investigate what they will and won't eat, and why.</p>
<p><i>Sharkman</i><br /> Michael Rutzen is on an unbelievable quest: to hypnotize a great white shark into becoming a docile playmate. Convinced there is a gentle side to these ferocious predators, Rutzen must seek out and identify a potential shark and then manipulate it into a sleepy state known as &quot;tonic.&quot; Will he succeed, or will he be throwing left-handed for the remainder of his life?</p>
<p>What surprised me most about watching <b>Shark Week: Ocean of Fear</b> is how little I actually learned about sharks. There is plenty of blood and gore on display, and lots of shots of sharks biting and chomping things, but if you are looking for a detailed biology of the species you're going to be disappointed. I watched all six episodes of this series and learned very little about shark procreation, life cycles, or general habits. Instead, we get many of the same facts (they are attracted to motion, they can smell their prey, they bite) repeated <i>ad naseum</i>, making much of the material repetitive.</p>
<p>Two of the episodes, <i>Ocean of Fear: Worst Shark Attack Ever</i> and <i>Top Five Eaten Alive</i> make heavy use of recreations and suffer for it. <i>Ocean of Fear: Worst Shark Attack Ever</i> has access to survivors of the <i>USS Indianapolis</i>, but too often relegates them to the sidelines. Why would we want to see actors recounting the experience when we have the actual men who lived through the experience? <i>Top Five Eaten Alive</i>, in turn, throws so much red dye into its re-enactments of shark attacks that it ends up almost comical. There is something a little grotesque about people's suffering being turned into breathless, bloody entertainment, and this segment often crosses that line.</p>
<p>There are some decent episodes in <b>Shark Week: Ocean of Fear</b>, however. <i>Sharkman</i> concentrates less on the &quot;man eating&quot; shtick to take a gentler approach to the creatures, and <i>Shark Tribe</i> reveals some interesting facts about a culture many of us have never heard of. The danger element is never entirely subdued in these segments, but the fear-mongering is lessened enough at times so that we can concentrate on something else besides the blood and gore.</p>
<p>The episodes featured on <b>Shark Week: Ocean of Fear</b> are straight dumps from the original broadcast, but they are very good in terms of quality. The image suffers from no apparent defects and beautifully captures the underwater realm of these creatures. The 2-channel Dolby audio is well-balanced between dialogue, sound effects, and music. Unfortunately, there are no sub-titles and no extras included in the release.</p>
<p>It's a shame that <b>Shark Week: Ocean of Fear</b> couldn't take a more balanced and informative position towards it's subject, but I guess the Discovery Channel knows what people want when it comes to this event. If you are looking for sharks doing the things that sharks are famous for, then <b>Shark Week: Ocean of Fear</b> will more than satisfy.</p>
<p><b>Shark Week: Ocean of Fear</b> is chastised for its lack of special features, but released back into the sea for delivering what fans want.</p>
<p>Not guilty.</p>
]]>
</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Sunset Tan: Season One</title>
<link>http://www.dvdverdict.com/reviews/sunsettanseason1.php</link>
<dc:date>2008-08-28</dc:date>
<dc:contributor>Ian Visser</dc:contributor>
<description>
<![CDATA[

<h1>The Charge</h1>
<p>Heidi: <i>So what's it like working here?</i></p>
<p>Nick: <i>It's like being in high school.</i></p>

<h1>The Case</h1>
<p>It seems there is hardly a job these days that doesn't warrant its own reality show. After exhausting the cooking and fashion professions, networks have gone on to create shows about such marginal career choices as tattooing, motorcycle construction, bounty hunting, cake decorating, and now, tanning. <b>Sunset Tan: Season One</b> chronicles the lives of employees working at a series of Sunset Tan salons in Los Angeles. We watch as they compete for seniority, balance their work and personal lives, and struggle to meet their bosses' expectations.</p>
<p>The main thrust of this first season is the competition between employees for the manager slot at the new Las Vegas location (it's pretty telling of the nature of the people involved that their biggest goal is to run a tanning salon in Las Vegas). There is plenty of back-biting, conniving, and smack-talking as a quartet of managers and workers jostle for favor with the owners in order to get the lucrative position. The owners, in turn, decide the best way to choose a manager is to fly the whole group to Las Vegas and have them publicly belittle each other, then act surprised when the whole thing goes into the toilet.</p>
<p>Our sympathies in this quest are supposed to lie with two employees: Nick, the manager of the West Hollywood location that is trying to advance as quickly as possible within the company, and Erin, a na&#239;ve Oklahoma girl who is learning the ropes and trying to adjust to life in L.A. Nick starts out the show as the only employee bothering to act professionally, but by the end of the season is revealed to be just as insecure and mean-spirited as everyone else. Erin initially resists indoctrination into the L.A. lifestyle, but eventually concedes and ends up as zombie-fied like every other woman in the cast. Everyone else is around to act as obnoxiously as possible as they sabotage each other's careers -- and often their own -- in the process.</p>
<p>Then we have the &quot;Olly Girls,&quot; Holly and Molly. This pair of bleached-blonde bimbos has been hired for four specific reasons (try to guess what they are). The Sunset Tan duo of dunces is the biggest giveaway that this show is as fake as a spray-on tan; they are portrayed as dumb as hammers, but still manage to come up with incredibly clever and insightful comments. Even if the pair managed to get a clue, they are so impossibly bad as employees that there is no way that even the people who run this company would allow them to stay on, even as eye candy. Look for this pair to do a Maxim spread and a guest spot on a <i>Two and a Half Men</i> as Charlie Sheen conquests before they fade away into obscurity.</p>
<p>Who exactly is show made for, I ask myself? Has the tanning industry felt slighted by being left out of the reality show genre up to this point? Do tanning salon owners feel that their profession isn't getting the respect it deserves? Well, <b>Sunset Tan: Season One</b> won't do much to improve the image of the industry. Loaded with vain, unprofessional twenty-something's with no concept on how business (or even life) actually works, this show does for the tanning business what &quot;Fast Food Nation&quot; did for McDonalds.</p>
<p>The show tries to spice up the proceedings with a parade of celebrities coming into the salons for tanning treatments. We start out on a high note with a Britney Spears cameo, but the celebrity client list quickly descends to D-list status. Is Chris Kattan really that big of a deal? How about professional houseguest Kato Kaelin? Pauly Shore? Porn star Jenna Jameson? How about the ex-wife of steroid fan Jose Cansenco? If anything, this selection of bottom-run clients makes Sunset Tan look much more low-rent than it is supposed to be.</p>
<p>It's hard to believe that any company that appears to be as badly managed as Sunset Tan could continue to attract customers, let alone remain profitable. Employees and managers do little besides gossip and betray each other's confidences, and the two owners seem to spend most of their time dressing themselves in the most ridiculous and inappropriate outfits possible. Even if most of the shenanigans on display are generated for the camera, what kind of businessmen are willing to allow their company to assume the appearance of an out-of-control circus run by half-retarded monkeys? If Sunset Tan ever goes public, take my advice and short the hell out of it.</p>
<p>It was tough for me to tell at first glance if the color was off for this release, or if everyone featured was just too tanned and orange. Turns out it was mostly the release; the full-screen image possesses an intensity of the red color palette that causes flaring in several episodes. The only other shortcoming is some graininess present in the evening or night scenes. The audio is the standard 2-channel Dolby Digital, which is acceptable for this kind of fare.</p>
<p>The special features on <b>Sunset Tan: Season One</b> are pretty slim, even for a television release. In addition to three deleted scenes, we get a couple of minutes of cast interviews from a red carpet event. The bulk of the extras are twelve segments in which the Olly Girls demonstrate important tasks such as washing cars, building sand castles, and (I kid you not) how to perform CPR. This is soft-core cheesecake stuff, and isn't good for much more than some low-grade titillation. In short, don't count on what you learn helping to save someone's life if they have a heart attack.</p>
<p>This show isn't even a guilty pleasure; it's just plain guilty. Absent even of the &quot;so bad its good&quot; element that can redeem other reality shows, <b>Sunset Tan: Season One</b> is just bad, lazy entertainment in a field that is already too crowded with mediocre offerings.</p>
<p>Burn this one to a crisp.</p>
]]>
</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Television Under The Swastika</title>
<link>http://www.dvdverdict.com/reviews/tvunderswastika.php</link>
<dc:date>2008-08-28</dc:date>
<dc:contributor>William Lee</dc:contributor>
<description>
<![CDATA[

<h1>The Charge</h1>
<p>The world's first television broadcasts -- brought to you by Nazi Germany.</p>

<h1>The Case</h1>
<p>In March of 1935, the world's first television broadcasting service went on the air with the words &quot;Heil, Hitler.&quot; For the next nine years, Greater German Television ruled the airwaves. Newsreels, cooking shows, documentaries, educational program and variety shows trumpeted the glory of the Third Reich to German citizens from an 8 x 10 inch screen.</p>
<p><p style="text-align: center"><img src="/images/reviewpics/tvunder.jpg" alt="television under the swastika" /></p></p>
<p><b>Television Under the Swastika</b> is a brisk documentary, made for German television by director Michael Kloft (<b>The Reich Underground</b>), chronicling the world's first television shows. Archival footage provides a taste of what was seen during this time and a handful of historians put it in context. There are even personal accounts from a few surviving original staffers.</p>
<p>The first part of the documentary briefly talks about the technology of early television. Initially, the picture quality was so poor that Joseph Goebbels dismissed the medium as an effective propaganda tool. In the early days, only a few hundred television sets were available. Elite Nazi members had them installed in their homes and television parlors were set up for public viewings. It wasn't until the 1936 Summer Olympics that television gained popular acceptance when 160,000 Germans watched the games on TV screens.</p>
<p>The archival footage -- 285 reels of film recovered from the catacombs of the Berlin Federal Film Archive -- is the main attraction. Most programs were broadcast live and since a method of recording television did not exist yet, all of those broadcasts are lost. In order to have programs that could be rerun, a film troupe was tasked with producing content on 35mm film. Covering everything from interviews with Nazi officials to vaudeville acts and musical performances, these filmed programs are all that remain of Nazi TV.</p>
<p>It is no surprise that these TV shows openly promote the ideals of the Third Reich, but it almost seems comical how they practically beg for official approval. Though rife with Nazi propaganda, these programs did not match the frightening majesty of Leni Riefenstahl's films. One variety show host pauses to remind viewers that good Germans don't criticize the Nazi party. Instructional programs teach women how to be good wives for the cause of bettering the Aryan race. A sporting competition featuring amputees encourages maimed soldiers to find new ways of being useful. Ironically, one of the former film troupe workers tells us, the Nazi officials were largely hands-off when it came to television because the propagandists saw it as an &quot;insignificant medium.&quot; Consequently, the television producers continually sought ways to demonstrate that they were essential to the war effort. As the tide turned against Germany, the role of television, and the nature of its message, moved away from cultural promotion and toward moral-boosting entertainment for recovering soldiers.</p>
<p>While it is quite satisfying to see so much of the recovered archival footage, the second half of the documentary drags. You can only watch so much Nazi propaganda before it feels tiresome. There are no key personalities in the film troupe, so the history of Greater German Television is less than engaging. Tracing the evolution of the broadcast service works well enough to provide a chronological framework for the various clips. The most fascinating information comes early when Kloft focuses on the technology of early television. The medium is so established now that no one ever stops to wonder how it actually works. The topic is only fleetingly covered, but I enjoyed the explanations of how the cameras and other equipment worked. However, I'm still unsure how filmed footage was broadcast. Did they simply project it on a wall and then point the TV camera at it?</p>
<p>This DVD presents the program in a translated English narration, without optional subtitles. The archival footage and some interviews retain their original German audio and these scenes are permanently subtitled. The soundtrack is reasonable strong, dialogue is clear, but it only does what is required for the program. The picture quality is good throughout and the new interview footage is bright and clean. The archival clips are visibly worn in places, with varying degrees of dust and scratches, but even these scenes have good image detail considering their age. Among the meager extras, you can read the director's biography on two screens of text. There is also a WWII film gallery that advertises for 14 other Nazi-themed movies available from First Run Features.</p>
<p><b>Television Under the Swastika</b> is a treasure trove for history buffs with an interest in WWII, Nazi propaganda or early television. Who invented TV remains open to debate -- demonstrations of the technology date back to the 1920s -- but the archival footage on display here proves Nazi Germany was the first to establish a regular broadcast service. Accordingly, we can add bad television to the list of Nazi crimes. This DVD is not guilty and Kloft is free to dig up more material from history's well.</p>
]]>
</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Where In The World Is Osama Bin Laden?</title>
<link>http://www.dvdverdict.com/reviews/whereisosama.php</link>
<dc:date>2008-08-28</dc:date>
<dc:contributor>Brendan Babish</dc:contributor>
<description>
<![CDATA[

<h1>The Charge</h1>
<p>&quot;Yoo-hoo? Osama?&quot;</p>

<h1>The Case</h1>
<p>I'm sure many of you know documentarian Morgan Spurlock as the man who ate nothing but McDonald's food for a month in <b>Super Size Me</b>. While that film certainly brought him notoriety, it was his series <i>30 Days</i> -- in particular the episode on what it's like to live on minimum wage -- that solidified his talents for me. Spurlock's irreverent wit can sometimes undermine the substance of his message, but he is a great communicator and has a unique voice. In <b>Where in the World is Osama Bin Laden?</b> Spurlock takes on America's War on Terror; while there are many worthwhile moments in the film, this might have been too big a subject for a single film, especially one with such a broad focus.</p>
<p>In the movie, Spurlock explains that after learning that his wife was pregnant, he became concerned with his impending child's safety, which led to fears of international terrorism. Of course, Osama Bin Laden is pretty much the poster boy for that. So, in his bid to both understand what causes terrorism and motivates the terrorists -- as well as a quixotic search for Bin Laden himself -- Spurlock headed to some of the world's terrorist hot spots, such as Afghanistan, Israel, the Palestinian Territories, and Egypt. While there, he interviewed government leaders, intellectuals, and people on the street, who often provided the most insightful comments of all.</p>
<p>Of course, one of the biggest assets with any Spurlock documentary is its humor. Spurlock has great comic ability and, almost like a roving reporter on something like <i>The Daily Show</i>, his quips enliven otherwise banal conversation. Spurlock's jibes make otherwise pointless scenes -- such as his anti-terrorist training -- entertaining.</p>
<p>Spurlock also does a commendable job trying in presenting regular citizens of countries that many Americans consider enablers of terrorism. His conversations with people in Egypt and the Palestinian Territories are particularly interesting. In America, we so often hear sweeping generalizations about the Middle East, and it's worthwhile to be reminded of just how many people there seem not only mild-mannered, but downright friendly and generous. When Spurlock sits in a Palestinian family's living room and listens to the parents talk about educational opportunities for their children, you realize how the average American's concerns might not be all that different from the average Palestinian's.</p>
<p>That said, I have to believe that Spurlock's information gathering and presentation presents an overly superficial glimpse of the region and the causes of terrorism. To a certain extent it is hard to hold this against the film. How could one explain the incredibly complex political situation in the Middle East <i>and</i> Afghanistan <i>and</i> Pakistan in an hour-and-a-half movie? But still, Spurlock's methods can too often lead one to believe that the situation is more simple and straightforward than it really is.</p>
<p>An example of this is when Spurlock explains the United States' history of propping up unpopular dictators in the Middle East, in particular the Shah of Iran and Egypt's President Hosni Mubarak. Spurlock doesn't explain why America has supported these leaders, and even infers that this support helps bring about Muslim theocracies, like that in Iran. While Spurlock's larger point, that America shouldn't be supporting Middle Eastern dictators, may be sound, by neglecting to point out that many believe these dictators are subverting additional Muslim theocracies, he is withholding a salient viewpoint.</p>
<p>Additionally, Spurlock's pursuit of Bin Laden, which is never really meant to be taken seriously, serves as only as a loose unifying thread of the piece, as he often asks his interview subjects what they think of Bin Laden and/or where he is located. While the latter question generates some amusing responses, it is a bit of an insubstantial diversion from the real purpose of the documentary, which seems to be to provide viewers a better understanding of these countries at the front line of the War on Terror.</p>
<p>In addition to the film itself, the DVD features a nice assortment of extras. In addition to an alternate ending (no, he doesn't find Bin Laden in this one either) there are several interviews with foreign leaders and a particularly interesting featurette on what it is like to be a woman in Saudi Arabia, which is -- don't forget -- an ally in the War on Terror.</p>
<p>While <b>Where in the World is Osama Bin Laden?</b> fails to provide great balance and insight, it is an enjoyable and thought-provoking documentary that is certainly timely this election season. Not guilty.</p>
]]>
</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>The Big Bang Theory: The Complete First Season</title>
<link>http://www.dvdverdict.com/reviews/bigbangseason1.php</link>
<dc:date>2008-08-27</dc:date>
<dc:contributor>Erich Asperschlager</dc:contributor>
<description>
<![CDATA[

<h1>The Charge</h1>
<p>Leonard (to Penny): <i>I have a board. If you like boards, this is my board.</i><br /> Penny: <i>Holy Smokes!</i><br /> Sheldon: <i>If by &quot;holy smokes&quot; you mean a derivative restatement of the kind of stuff you can find scribbled on the wall of any men's room at M.I.T., sure.</i><br /> Leonard: <i>What?</i><br /> Sheldon: <i>Oh, come on. Who hasn't seen this differential below, &quot;Here I sit, broken hearted&quot;?</i><br /></p>

<h1>Opening Statement</h1>
<p>As the newest comedy to fill the hole in CBS's Monday night line-up, <b>The Big Bang Theory</b> garnered a loyal enough fan base to swing a second season. With the first new episode less than a month away, let's take a look back on the geek-chic sitcom's freshman season, now available on DVD.</p>

<h1>Facts of the Case</h1>
<p>Roommates Leonard (Johnny Galecki, <i>My Boys</i>) and Sheldon (Jim Parsons, <i>Judging Amy</i>) spend their days contemplating string theory and their nights playing three-dimensional chess and arguing about comic books with their geek colleague pals Howard (Simon Helberg, <i>Studio 60 on the Sunset Strip</i>) and Raj (Kunal Nayyar, <b>S.C.I.E.N.C.E</b>). But everything changes for the socially awkward tetrad when midwestern beauty Penny (Kaley Cuoco, <i>Charmed</i>) moves in across the hall.</p>

<h1>The Evidence</h1>
<p>You've got to hand it to CBS. Over the past several years, they've made a solid attempt at unseating NBC's sitcom dominance, thanks to a strong Monday night comedy line-up. Anchored by the bafflingly successful <i>Two and a Half Men</i> and the legitimately hilarious <i>How I Met Your Mother</i>, the only thing missing for the Big Eye has been a reliable replacement for retired network mainstay <i>King of Queens</i>, which ended its run in 2007. Julia Louis-Dreyfuss vehicle <i>The New Adventures of Old Christine</i> broke the <i>Seinfeld</i> curse back in 2006, even as promising series <i>The Class</i> found itself unable to graduate to a second season. With an open slot in the 8 p.m. hour, CBS rolled its twelve-sided dice on comic-com <b>The Big Bang Theory</b> in the fall of 2007 -- and it looks like they've got a winner.</p>
<p>Created by Chuck Lorre, the mind behind some of CBS's biggest sitcom properties (including <i>Two and a Half Men</i> and <i>Dharma &amp; Greg</i>), <b>Big Bang</b> pairs industry mainstay Johnny Galecki with relative newcomer Jim Parsons. They might play physicists, but what's most noticeable about them is their chemistry.</p>
<p>Fans of <i>Roseanne</i> (a show co-produced by Lorre) know Galecki as David, young suitor to Sara Gilbert's moody Darlene. Fans of the TBS sitcom <i>My Boys</i> know him as the awesomely annoying &quot;Trouty.&quot; <b>Big Bang Theory</b> (which reunites him with Gilbert, who plays Leonard's sometime love interest Leslie) gives Galecki his first chance to shine in a starring role. As by far the most fleshed-out and sympathetic character on the show, Leonard gives the wariest audience members an entree into the geekiest of worlds, and no one is geekier than Jim Parsons' Sheldon.</p>
<p>Sheldon is both fascinating and infuriating. A mix between Niles Crane and <i>Star Trek: The Next Generation</i>'s Data, he approaches the world with the kind of arrogant literalism that makes <i>not</i> being a genius seem like secretly winning the lottery. Many episodes center on his inability to understand why he's so darn lucky anyone wants to hang out with him at all. Why, for instance, his three friends might want to kick him off their Physics Bowl team for refusing to let any of them answer the questions, or why hiding out at an all-day <b>Planet of the Apes</b> marathon is preferable to taking care of him while he's sick.</p>
<p>Though Sheldon's dangerously high IQ puts the show in danger of an atomic geekplosion, Kaley Cuoco's Penny brings things back down to earth. As the object of Leonard's not-so-secret affection, and someone who helps bring the guys out of their shells, Penny is basically the reason this show exists. And yet, <b>Big Bang Theory</b>'s biggest problem is that she's severely underused. The hilarity of her getting to know the gang in the early episodes takes a dive about a third of the way through the season, until she's little more than a wacky neighbor who drops in on them occasionally, or whom they occasionally drop in on at the restaurant where she works. It's as if the writers knew she'd be a great foil for the geeks, but couldn't figure out how to develop her any further. Although her character gets some much-needed screen and story time at the end of the season -- and, if the finale is to be believed, will have even more to do in season two -- leaving such a talented actress with so little to do remains the biggest flaw in <b>Big Bang</b>'s comic experiment.</p>
<p>Rounding out the cast are Simon Helberg as horny Jew Howard Wolowitz, and Kunal Nayyar's Rajnesh Koothrappali -- a man so terrified by women, he's unable to utter a syllable in their presence. Both manage to transcend the caricatures they often threaten to turn into.</p>
<p>The best and worst that can be said for <b>The Big Bang Theory</b> is that it's a solid show. Unlike many traditional sitcoms, the jokes are actually funny. Unfortunately, like many traditional sitcoms, the plots are...well...traditional. Most of the action takes place either in Leonard and Sheldon's apartment, or Penny's apartment, or where Leonard and Sheldon work, or where Penny works. One of the things the best modern sitcoms (<i>My Name is Earl</i>, <i>30 Rock</i>, <i>How I Met Your Mother</i>, etc.) have proven is that variety is the spice of comedy. Those shows rely on outrageous plots and unlikely scenarios. <b>Big Bang Theory</b>, meanwhile, focuses way too heavily on staid sitcom storylines -- the Halloween party episode, the episode where the guys vie for a pretty girl's attention, the episode where someone's mother visits. The show's saving grace is that the characters and writers are able to make standard plot devices feel fresh and funny.</p>
<p><b>The Big Bang Theory: The Complete First Season</b> features all 17 episodes of the strike-shortened season in industry-standard anamorphic widescreen. The colors are bright and crisp -- an important plus in a show where its characters wear a revolving wardrobe of comic book themed t-shirts and are surrounded by all manner of geek memorabilia including, in one episode, a replica of the Time Machine used in the 1960 film. The sound is limited to surround stereo, but it gets the job done and serves The Barenaked Ladies' catchy theme song well through the many, many times you'll end up hearing it.</p>
<p>The set's lone extra is a 17-minute behind the scenes featurette called &quot;Quantum Mechanics.&quot; It's mostly clips from the show interspersed by Chuck Lorre and executive producer Bill Prady talking about how wonderful everyone is.</p>

<h1>The Rebuttal Witnesses</h1>
<p>One of the reasons I avoided <b>The Big Bang Theory</b> when it first aired was that networks don't have the best track record when it comes to representing nerd characters. Even ignoring the most outrageous offenders -- Urkel and Screech, I'm looking at you -- it seems whenever a script calls for a geek, an executive panic sets in that says, &quot;Our audience can't relate to these characters, so we'd better limit what they say to <i>Star Trek</i> references.&quot; Though <b>Big Bang</b> deserves props for giving its audience enough credit to understand references to <i>Green Lantern</i> and <b>Tron</b>. Unfortunately, the show often relies on the old stand-bys. <b>Star Wars</b> jokes abound, as do references to <b>Lord of the Rings</b> and juice boxes.</p>
<p>But perhaps the biggest problem is that, despite painting its main characters as socially awkward geeks, there's a lot of effort put into trying to get them laid. By mid-season, three out of the four guys have had sex, and Wolowitz spends pretty much the rest of the season trying to do it again. Given the characters, it just doesn't seem right. Maybe I'm old-fashioned, but would it be so wrong for Leonard to pine for Penny in a way that doesn't point out that his ultimate goal is to get her between the sheets?</p>

<h1>Closing Statement</h1>
<p><b>The Big Bang Theory</b> deserves its second season, and if you missed the series last year, this is a good time to catch up -- though you may just want to give it a rental. There's room for improvement, but like any object at rest, this show is full of potential. All it needs is a push to make it great.</p>

<h1>The Verdict</h1>
<p>Since I can't understand what any of those formulas mean, I'll have to take your word for it. Not guilty.</p>
]]>
</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Camp Rock: Extended Rock Star Edition</title>
<link>http://www.dvdverdict.com/reviews/camprock.php</link>
<dc:date>2008-08-27</dc:date>
<dc:contributor>Michael Stailey</dc:contributor>
<description>
<![CDATA[

<h1>The Charge</h1>
<p>The hottest cast of performers at the coolest summer camp anywhere!</p>

<h1>Opening Statement</h1>
<p>There's no denying The Disney Channel captured lightning in a bottle with <b>High School Musical</b>. But with this cash cow quickly heading out to pasture, the network was desperately searching for the next big thing. Luckily for them they had the Jonas Brothers (Hannah Montana's B-siders) in their back pocket. Unluckily for us, their cinematic debut is loaded with cookie cutter stereotypes, poor dialogue, lousy lip-synching, and bad bad acting.</p>

<h1>Facts of the Case</h1>
<p>Girl has a dream. Girl's hopes are crushed. Girl's dream comes true. Girl pretends to be someone she's not. Girl meets boy. Truth about Girl is revealed. Girl loses boy. Girl learns to live true to who she is. Girl wins boy back. Girl and boy live happily ever after.</p>

<h1>The Evidence</h1>
<p>Let's be honest. There's nothing original here. Mix <b>High School Musical</b> with <b>Fame</b>, <b>Cinderella</b>, <b>Mean Girls</b>, and a dash of <b>A Hard Day's Night</b> and you have <b>Camp Rock</b>. Then again, this is bubble gum entertainment for the tween scene, most of whom could care less that the films of their youth are shallow derivatives of greater tales. Heck, they get the Jonas Brothers on screen for an hour. That's what matters most.</p>
<p>Joe Jonas, the middle brother, plays Shane, a bad boy pop star banished to the role of celebrity camp counselor, after a falling out with his band -- Connect Three -- forces the cancellation of their summer tour. The camp is owned by his uncle (which has no impact on the story whatsoever) and is supposed to be the place where his rise to fame began three years earlier. In a <b>Cinderella</b> twist, Shane has become enchanted by the disembodied voice of a fellow camper -- Mitchie, played by Demi Lovato -- whom he's supposedly spending the summer trying to identify, but never really puts any effort into it. Mitchie is a girl from the wrong side of the gilded industry tracks. Instead of being the child of famous parent (like the rest of bunk-mates), she's the daughter of the camp caterer, which is how she was able to attend. Of course, to fit in, she makes up some bogus story about her mom, which ultimately proves her undoing. Hence, the film is peppered with classic teen messages of &quot;be yourself,&quot; &quot;don't lie,&quot; and &quot;know who your real friends are,&quot; none of which come across as organic.</p>
<p>Demi, with her Michelle Branch/Vanessa Carlton vibe, holds her own in the vocal department and establishes a nice chemistry with Joe, albeit outside the scripted dialogue. Joe, on the other hand, is somewhat of a train wreck. Even during what's supposed to be quiet acoustical moment, when given the opportunity to do what he does best, director Matthew Diamond forces him to lip synch to an overproduced track in which either he or his brothers sing back up. This is shot with Shane and Mitchie on the pier, siting no more than two feet apart, and Joe belting out this tune like he's playing to stadium of 10,000 screaming girls. It's ridiculous.</p>
<p>Speaking of ridiculous, poor Meaghan Jette Martin is in way over her head as Tess, the golden child camp queen whose mom is a Broadway superstar. Without the chops to pull it off, this villainess is toothless and her so-called redemption is ill conceived and carries no weight. Aside from Demi, the only other two performance bright spots are Alyson Stoner (<i>Mike's Super Short Show</i>) as the geeky Caitlyn -- who actually learned how to sing just for this role -- and the youngest Jonas, Nick, who it turns out was the first of the brothers to be signed to a real life recording contract. The other two apparently tagged along for the ride.</p>
<p>Every possible summer camp, underdog, musical competition, &quot;I'm famous but just wanna be a kid&quot; convention you could possible imagine is crammed into this script, penned by vintage MTV comedienne Julie Brown (not Ms. Wubba-Wubba-Wubba) and her brother Paul who used to write for <i>Quantam Leap</i> and <i>The X-Files</i>. Even the finale, with it's <b>Rocky</b> rehearsal montage leading up to the big &quot;Final Jam,&quot; plays out like an episode of <i>America's Got Talent</i>.</p>
<p>In the end, it's the adult production team who are to blame for dumbing things down to empty-headed banality. The kids do what they're asked, to the best of their ability, and you can't hold anything against them for that.</p>
<p>Presented in glorious Disney Channel full frame format, it crops out 25% of what was actually filmed in 1.78 anamorphic widescreen. Yet another bonehead move by the producers. The Dolby 5.1 audio is serviceable and your kids are likely to crank it up as they bounce around the room.</p>
<p>The bonus materials are crafted in the patented Disney Channel short attention span style, with lots of talking heads, in artistically formatted quick cuts, with an ever present musical underscore. All of these pieces tie into the &quot;Rock Star&quot; theme, headlined by the cast giving kids instructions on how to fast track their life to the big time in &quot;How to Be a Rock Star!&quot; The mini-doc &quot;Jonas Brothers: Real-Life Rock Stars&quot; tells the quick history of how the boys got into the business. &quot;Introducing Demi Lovato&quot; serves the same purpose for the young actress, in half the time. The rest are EPK fluff like the &quot;Camp Memories&quot; behind-the-scenes slide show; &quot;Hasta La Vista&quot; and &quot;Too Cool&quot; rehearsal footage; &quot;Start the Party&quot; and &quot;We Rock&quot; music videos; and karaoke/sing-a-long options for your own little rock stars.</p>
<p>Which brings me to an interesting point...the use of the word &quot;Rock&quot; here is sorely misconstrued. "Rock" is the Rolling Stones, The Who, Led Zepplin, The Doors, Aerosmith, AC/DC, Van Halen, and so on. What we're dealing with here is manufactured Pop. Big difference. In fact, there's one cabin scene between the three Jonas boys that could have been lifted right out of any episode of <i>The Monkees</i>, with Kevin doing a dead-on Peter Tork impersonation. So, referring to anything in this project as &quot;Rock&quot; besmirches 50 years of reckless abandon and downward spiral into sex, drugs, and creative genius. Hell, these kids aren't even allowed to share a kiss, knowing full well the look in their eyes says they want to jump each other's bones.</p>

<h1>Closing Statement</h1>
<p>Curmudgeonly critical analysis aside, <b>Camp Rock</b> is harmless Disney fun for the 7-15 crowd. They already own the soundtrack, know the lyrics, and have the choreography down cold. Buying the DVD is a no-brainer. But calling it exceptional cinematic entertainment is not gonna happen.</p>

<h1>The Verdict</h1>
<p>H-A-S-T-AAAAAA La Vista!</p>
]]>
</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Dana Carvey: Squatting Monkeys Tell No Lies</title>
<link>http://www.dvdverdict.com/reviews/danacarveymonkeys.php</link>
<dc:date>2008-08-27</dc:date>
<dc:contributor>Bill Gibron</dc:contributor>
<description>
<![CDATA[

<h1>The Charge</h1>
<p>Isn't that special...sort of.</p>

<h1>The Case</h1>
<p>Dana Carvey's career trajectory had always been rather difficult to pinpoint. He started out in standup, his gift for mimicry and impersonation landing him some immediate local recognition. Yet when he moved from his Northern California home to try his hand at Hollywood, bit parts in <b>Halloween II</b> and a supporting part in the Mickey Rooney sitcom (?) <i>One of the Boys</i> were all he could muster. That all changed in 1986, when he won a role on the celebrated <i>Saturday Night Live</i>. As part of the late-night comedy cavalcade's latest renaissance of generational greatness, he made characters like Garth Algar, The Church Lady, and &quot;pumped up&quot; bodybuilder Hans household names. He also tackled political personalities of the time like George H.W. Bush and Ross Perot. After the triumphant spinoff film <b>Wayne's World</b> (with one Mike Myers), Carvey left <i>SNL</i>, hoping to capitalize on his meteoric rise. But since then, he's found little direct success. His solo starring vehicles (<b>Clean Slate</b>, <b>The Master of Disguise</b>) were minor mainstream hits, while supporting roles in <b>The Road to Wellville</b> and <b>Trapped in Paradise</b> did little to help. Even his own TV sketch comedy series only lasted five episodes. By 2002, he was all but absent from the cultural map.</p>
<p>As part of this live comedy concert, taped last year around his hometown of San Carlos, California, Carvey updates us on both his life and his living. You may know that he faced a health crisis in 1997 when doctors found a blockage in one of his arteries and decided to operate. Unfortunately, the surgery went horribly wrong, and Carvey faced several more procedures to correct the problem. In <b>Dana Carvey: Squatting Monkeys Tell No Lies</b>, he mentions this now stable situation, suggesting that people stop him all the time and inquire over his well-being. Naturally, he finds a way to ridicule such concern. He also addresses his kids, another reason for this low-profile performance. Indeed, much of the material here focuses on the New Age-ist way parents try to partner with their offspring in order to avoid chaos. While his observations are rather obvious, they do resonate with an inherent ridiculousness that comes from the notion of negotiating with a 6-year-old. Carvey's comedy can best be described as '80s observational, taking a common phrase like &quot;you're sh*tting me&quot; and extrapolating out its origins and conversational possibilities to an exaggerated degree.</p>
<p>It's the same with his takes on public officials. Most of <b>Monkeys</b>' longform rants focus on Andy Rooney, George W. Bush, Gov. Schwarzenegger, Al Gore, and Bill Clinton. While not necessarily the most topical of takes (he does give Obama and Hillary the business, if only briefly), he seems to relish reducing politicians to their smuggest, most butt-kissing conceits. Carvey's standup style can also be considered quite manic -- like Robin Williams without the scattered stream of consciousness and penis obsession -- and it is weird to hear someone we've seen on television and in youth-oriented films dropping the F-bomb here and there. Still, there's no denying the man's connection with his fans. The crowd for <b>Monkeys</b> may be made up of hometown supporters and individuals reclaiming some Greed-decade nostalgia, but they enjoy every moment of his near hour-long routine. There are the occasional weak spots (the Scientology bit goes on far too long) and lots of incomplete thoughts, but the give and take between man and audience member is enough to carry us across the meandering. Indeed, for those wondering how Carvey came to prominence, and where he's been since, <b>Squatting Monkeys Tell No Lies</b> is a good intro/reintroduction.</p>
<p>As a perfect means of contrast between the past and the present, HBO Video and this DVD package offers Carvey's only other comedy concert -- <i>Critics Choice</i> (from 1995) as part of this two-disc presentation. Far more freewheeling than <b>Monkeys</b>, this earlier work features the musical spoofs and parodies Carvey specialized in, as well as a more frenzied onstage shtick. In some ways, it's an unusual bit of added content, since it could possibly -- and frankly does -- usurp the main feature. <i>Choice</i> is the Carvey of <i>SNL</i> and stardom, the man who can do no wrong and knows it. <b>Monkeys</b> is a little more subdued, as if he's wondering whether audiences will still appreciate him.</p>
<p>Technically, the newer showcase outdoes its mid-'90s cohort in the all-important spec department. The 1.78:1 anamorphic widescreen images are almost identical, with <b>Monkeys</b>' updated HD look winning out. The colors for both are clean and bright, and the amount of detail is rather rich and inviting. Carvey actually looks younger now than he did during <i>Choice</i>. Sonically, both presentations arrive with a simple Dolby Digital Stereo mix. The lack of audience immersion is not missed, however, since all the material comes across without an aural hitch. As far as bonus features go, <i>Choice</i> is the best. The Q&amp;A with the <b>Monkeys</b> audience is just an excuse to revisit some unused riffs (the Church Lady, for one), while the extended footage is outtake quality only.</p>
<p>Of all the former <i>SNL</i> luminaries wearing out their welcome within the entertainment landscape (and we're looking at you, Guru Pitka), Carvey had the luck (or bad health happenstance) to drop out before he became a chore. Now he's back, and it definitely seems like the right time for a return. <b>Squatting Monkeys Tell No Lies</b> may not be the greatest comedy concert of his career, but it definitely offers what Carvey does best -- making people laugh. Not guilty.</p>
]]>
</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Hannah Montana And Miley Cyrus: Best Of Both Worlds Concert (Blu-Ray)</title>
<link>http://www.dvdverdict.com/reviews/hannahmontanabd.php</link>
<dc:date>2008-08-27</dc:date>
<dc:contributor>Kent Dixon</dc:contributor>
<description>
<![CDATA[

<h1>The Charge</h1>
<p>On stage she's a superstar. But at home she leads a totally normal life!</p>

<h1>Opening Statement</h1>
<p>The everyday appeal of Hilary Duff and the stage presence and energy of Shania Twain...ladies and gentlemen, Miley...ummm...I mean Hannah Montana!</p>

<h1>Facts of the Case</h1>
<p>What's better than Hannah Montana you ask? How about 90 minutes with Hannah Montana in concert in all her 1080p hi-def glory. What's better than hi-def Hannah? How about hi-def Hannah in 3-D? No, I'm not kidding. Welcome to the sold out Salt Lake City concert <b>Hannah Montana and Miley Cyrus: Best of Both Worlds Concert</b>.</p>

<h1>The Evidence</h1>
<p>I consider myself to be a fairly open-minded music aficionado. I love most classical music, jazz, and swing. I enjoy big band, industrial, and even some metal, but I just have to draw the line at country music, and just as Cheez Whiz is promoted as &quot;cheese food,&quot; I consider most country music to be &quot;music food.&quot; Yes, I've lost a dog at one time or another, had my heart broken, and had someone else drink my last beer, but I have never owned a pick-up truck, either foreign or domestic. So there is a fundamental lack of connection that impedes me from getting any significant level of enjoyment from country music.</p>
<p>Love him or hate him, American singer-songwriter Billy Ray Cyrus struck Platinum not once, but twice with his debut album <i>Some Gave All</i> in 1992 and the follow-up release, <i>It Won't Be The Last</i>, in 1993. I'd also say it's relatively impossible to mention the name Billy Ray Cyrus without conjuring up memories of his infamous hit song &quot;Achy Breaky Heart.&quot; His own success aside, I doubt even good ol' Billy Ray could have foreseen the success his family would achieve with the birth of his daughter Miley Ray (Destiny Hope at birth) Cyrus in 1992 at the peak of her father's musical career.</p>
<p>Miley was bitten by the acting bug at just 9 years old when her family briefly lived in Toronto, Canada, and she guest starred on her father's TV series <i>Doc</i>. In 2003, she appeared in Tim Burton's film <b>Big Fish</b> and appeared with her father on the Colgate Country Showdown. Little did anyone know what was about to happen when 12-year-old Miley auditioned for the lead role in a new Disney show called <b>Hannah Montana</b>.</p>
<p>The Walt Disney Company has had a hand in generating successful TV programming for decades now, dating back to the anthology series <i>The Wonderful World of Disney</i>, which aired from 1954 to 2005. And who can forget the other legendary Disney show, <i>The Mickey Mouse Club</i>, which boosted the careers of now-legendary performers like Annette Funicello, Tommy Kirk, and Kevin Corcoran? When the show underwent a revival in the 90s, it served as the starting point for several American pop superstars and actors including Britney Spears, Christina Aguilera, Justin Timberlake, JC Chasez, Keri Russell, and Academy Award-nominated actor Ryan Gosling.</p>
<p>With Disney at the helm and the multi-talented Miley Cyrus leading the charge, the entire <b>Hannah Montana</b> machine has become a phenomenon for today's crop of teeny-boppers. I mean no disrespect when I say that either, as Ms. Cyrus has won the hearts and ears of a massive audience of young boys and girls around the world. Following the debut of the TV show in March 2006, Miley Cyrus found herself at the forefront of a surge of success that has yet to subside. The show has a solid family appeal that, despite an often annoying laugh track, is not bad at all. And when it comes to singing and stage presence, you'd be hard pressed to find Miley Cyrus' equal in her own age bracket, or many others for that matter.<br /> With talent this big, Disney likely realized early on that they had lightning in a bottle, releasing a CD of music from the show in late 2006. In December 2007, Miley Cyrus was ranked 17th on the list of Forbes top 20 earners under the age of 25, with annual earnings of $3.5 million. And as of December 2007, Cyrus began working on a feature film spin-off of <b>Hannah Montana</b>, titled, appropriately enough, <b>Hannah Montana: The Movie</b>, due to be released in May 2009.</p>
<p>Okay, I may not be the target market for the show, but with an 8-year-old daughter in the house, I knew I'd eventually be laying my hard-earned cash at the feet of the All Powerful Cyrus. It began slowly with posters, CDs, and other miscellaneous trinkets and to this point, I just consider myself lucky that until now, my home town hasn't been a concert tour stop, or I know my VISA would be feeling the pain of that as well. I still get immeasurable pleasure from the fact that my daughter and her 6-year-old brother are amazed that Miley and Hannah Montana are actually the same person. It pleases me to no end as I often say, &quot;Yeah, that blonde wig is a tricky customer alright!&quot;</p>
<p>I popped this release into our PS3 with the most open-minded intentions possible. The fact that my daughter would love it was a foregone conclusion, but little did I expect to be tapping my foot and nodding my head along with almost every tune. Originally a theatrical release that had a one week run during the first week of February 2008, <b>Hannah Montana and Miley Cyrus: Best of Both Worlds Concert</b> is a high-energy, professional show that ranks with some of the best live concert performances I've ever seen either on DVD or in person. The 3-D movie brought in $8,651,758 on its opening day, and continued on to gross $31,117,834 to finish off the weekend, making it the highest-grossing opening weekend for a film to be released under 1,000 screens.</p>
<p>Miley Cyrus and her entire on-stage entourage give 110 per cent through the whole concert, delivering an hour and 22 minutes of fun. Kevin, Joe, and Nick Jonas, a.k.a. The Jonas Brothers, also join Hannah Montana on stage for one song and two of their own. As young pop boy bands go, The Jonas Brothers are a talented trio that adds to the entertainment value of the whole concert.</p>
<p>Concert Set List:</p>
<p><b>Hannah Montana</b></p>
<p>&quot;Rock Star&quot;<br /> &quot;Life's What You Make It&quot;<br /> &quot;Just Like You&quot;<br /> &quot;Nobody's Perfect&quot;<br /> &quot;Pumpin' Up the Party&quot;<br /> &quot;I Got Nerve&quot;<br /> &quot;We Got the Party (With Us)&#34;...featuring the Jonas Brothers</p>
<p><b>Jonas Brothers</b></p>
<p>&quot;When You Look Me in the Eyes&quot;<br /> &quot;Year 3000&quot;</p>
<p><b>Miley Cyrus</b></p>
<p>&quot;Start All Over&quot;<br /> &quot;See You Again&quot;<br /> &quot;Let's Dance&quot;<br /> &quot;Right Here&quot;<br /> &quot;I Miss You&quot;<br /> &quot;G.N.O. (Girl's Night Out)&quot;<br /> &quot;Best of Both Worlds&#34;...featuring Hannah Montana</p>
<p>Viewers are given the option of watching the entire concert in either 2-D or 3-D 1080p hi-def and both versions are visually impressive. The depth and clarity is stunning with deep colors and deep, solid blacks that add to the drama of the darkened concert venue.</p>
<p>Turning to the 3-D presentation, thankfully this is not your grandmother's 3D. I still fondly remember my first experience with 3-D when I saw <b>The Creature From the Black Lagoon</b> as a kid. It may be my almost 40-year-old eyes, or the fact that the 3-D glasses were not designed to fit my adult-sized head, but I had to sit them forward on my nose to get the full 3-D effect. The blue and red colors of the 3-D effect are still somewhat visible as you watch, but the 3-D effect is still solid and entertaining. The behind the scenes and rehearsal segments that are intercut between songs are available in 2-D only, so viewers need to do some quick changes with their glasses from time to time, but it's never inconvenient or overly intrusive.</p>
<p>The audio is where the presentation really shines through the 7.1 DTS Master Audio track. Vocals are always crisp and clear, the bass delivers a solid foundation while never dominating the mix, and the surround channels get a solid workout. The bottom line? Viewers are left with an impressive Hannah Montana/Miley Cyrus concert experience, without the painful VISA bill to follow.</p>
<p>Bonus features include 2-D versions of the bonus songs &quot;S.O.S.&quot; by the Jonas Brothers and &quot;Good And Broken&quot; by Miley Cyrus. Viewers can also &quot;Sing Along With the Movie&quot; on 2-D versions of &quot;Rock Star&quot; and &quot;Life's What You Make It&quot; as the words appear on the screen karaoke style. &quot;The Ultimate Personal Tour&quot; follows Miley Cyrus back stage from when she arrives at the venue, through sound checks and wardrobe and show time until she heads back to her bus after a job well done. The &quot;Song Selection&quot; feature allows viewers to jump directly to their favorite song or to &quot;Play All.&quot; &quot;</p>

<h1>The Rebuttal Witnesses</h1>
<p>I get the concept of the TV show and that folks seem to have no ability to distinguish Hannah Montana from mild mannered teenager Miley Stewart, but it's still a bit weird that the audience starts the concert off chanting &quot;Hannah, Hanna&quot; and Cyrus hits the stage sporting her blonde locks. But I'm also the guy who's willing to suspend the disbelief that no one can figure out that without those thick glasses Clark Kent is really Superman, and that when Bruce Wayne simply lowers his voice and covers the top half of his face, Holy Conundrum! He's Batman!</p>

<h1>Closing Statement</h1>
<p>If you're looking for a solidly entertaining, family-appropriate concert release, this is it.</p>
<p>Prior to the sold out Salt Lake City concert that is featured in <b>Hannah Montana and Miley Cyrus: Best of Both Worlds Concert</b>, a local radio station held a promotion where fathers had the opportunity to compete against each other, running while wearing high heels. Having seen this release, I'd definitely be up for a high-heeled sprint to take my daughter to a concert like this. Miley Cyrus is a shooting star who has years of career and incredible talent to share with her fans around the world.</p>

<h1>The Verdict</h1>
<p>Miley Cyrus and Hannah Montana in hi-def and 3-D? How could they possibly be guilty?</p>
]]>
</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>The Little Mermaid: Ariel's Beginning</title>
<link>http://www.dvdverdict.com/reviews/arielsbeginning.php</link>
<dc:date>2008-08-27</dc:date>
<dc:contributor>Michael Stailey</dc:contributor>
<description>
<![CDATA[

<h1>The Charge</h1>
<p>Every story has a beginning, but only one begins under the sea.</p>

<h1>Opening Statement</h1>
<p>Late into the Michael Eisner regime, Disney was bleeding its many franchise characters dry by churning out sub-par sequels like a Wal-Mart South American sweat shop. But when Bob Iger took over the company, initiated the merger with Pixar, and placed prodigal son John Lasseter at the helm of the company's animation division, Walt's original nine old men smiled a collective ethereal smile. The pillaging and plundering had finally ended. And while there were still a few projects left in active development, John and his team ran them through the development gauntlet before giving the green light to continue. True, the damage had been done and there was no way to erase the litany of past embarrassments (<b>Cinderella II</b>, <b>Jungle Book 2</b>, <b>Belle's Magical World</b>), but they could at the very least ensure that these memorable characters would be held in high regard going forward. Such is the case of <b>The Little Mermaid: Ariel's Beginning</b>. While not a slam dunk successor to the original, this touching prequel adventure further enhances the story of Ariel and the unique bond she shares with her father, King Triton.</p>

<h1>Facts of the Case</h1>
<p>Long ago, the Kingdom of Atlantica was a magical place filled with music and love as set forth by the royal family of King Triton, Queen Athena, and their seven daughters. But a tragic accident shattered that world, and in their grief the kingdom suffered. Anything that reminded the King of his lost love was to be removed from sight and earshot. With a hardened heart, Triton threw himself into his work, hiring a governess to raise his daughters, and his forcing his subjects deep underground to keep their musical passions alive. But the spirit of Athena could not be supressed. Growing strong in their youngest daughter, Ariel, the awkwardly unassuming water nymph was about set this now regimented kingdom on its ear.</p>

<h1>The Evidence</h1>
<p>By all rights, <b>The Little Mermaid</b> should stand shoulder to shoulder with <b>Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs</b>, <b>Sleeping Beauty</b>, and <b>101 Dalmatians</b> as the crown jewels of Disney animation. <b>Snow</b>'s pioneering ingenuity, <b>Beauty</b>'s sweeping visuals, and <b>Dalmatians</b> stylized pop art humor defined the company for two generations, but when the foundation of that great tradition began to crumble under the weight of its own bloated complacency, it was <b>Mermaid</b> that rebirthed Disney's once proud glory. So it's with great trepidation that we approach <b>Ariel's Beginning</b>, knowing full well that its predecessor <b>The Little Mermaid II: Return to the Sea</b> was an uninspired mistake. But director Peggy Holmes takes a script from Robert Reece (<b>Cinderella III: A Twist in Time</b>) and Evan Spiliotopoulos (<b>The Lion King 1 1/2</b>) and crafts a heartwarming father/daughter tale of love and loss, with enough extraneous goofiness to entertain the kids.</p>
<p><p style="text-align: center"><img src="/images/reviewpics/ariel01.jpg" alt="the little mermaid" /></p></p>
<p>Ariel continues to be the wide-eyed optimist, wanting nothing more than to experience life to its fullest. Her discovery of the kingdom's underground music scene, courtesy of new friend Flounder, and the ultimate redemption of her father's broken heart propels the story and leads us seamlessly into the opening of the original film. There were concerns on the part of Jodi Benson -- who has voiced and embodied Ariel for more than 20 years -- that the writers were trying too hard to modernize the character, but her insistence on remaining true to Ariel's innocence has paid off. While many of her supporting cast fill that 21st Century hipster vibe, there are no major disconnects in franchise.</p>
<p>Where <b>Ariel's Beginning</b> does falter is in its musical lifeblood, or lack thereof. The late Howard Ashman was the emotional core of Disney's modern royalty -- Ariel, Belle, and Jasmine. And while Broadway's Jeanine Tesori (<b>Thoroughly Modern Millie</b>) and composer James Dooley infuse their own musical talents into the film, they don't come anywhere close to Howard's genius. Jodi does get an opportunity to exercise her chords on &quot;I Remember&quot; and is always in fine form, but when Howard passed away, so did Ariel's true voice. So to label this a musical, would be false advertising. This is no more evident than in the character of Marina Del Rey, the girls' governess. While she's definitely no Ursula, feebly talk-singing her way through &quot;One Mistake,&quot; Oscar winner Sally Field creates an otherwise engaging portrayal, despite the lyrical failings. Unfortunately, Marina's evil ways fall well short of expectations, lacking originality (lifting Ursula's eel infatuation) and leaving her a toothless villain in the Disney pantheon. Another surprising disappointment can be found in the performance of Sam Wright as Sebastian. The 61 year old seems to have lost the spark and vocal edge that made the crustacean so memorable to begin with. There are times the character doesn't even sound like himself. But all performance shortcomings are forgiven whenever Triton appears. Jim Cummings does a masterful job with this complex emotional role, and in doing so becomes the definitive voice for this Disney monarch. He is, without a doubt, the highlight of the film.</p>
<p><p style="text-align: center"><img src="/images/reviewpics/ariel02.jpg" alt="the little mermaid" /></p></p>
<p>Elevating the level of ToonDisney animation from television grade to a step below feature quality, the 1.78:1 anamorphic presentation meshes well with Ariel's original big screen adventure. A rich color palette, detailed backgrounds, a nicely integrated mix of traditional and computer animation, and a depth of shading make up for the somewhat simplified character design. Ariel's sisters are fairly interchangeable, with few visual and personality touches to differentiate themselves. Marina looks like a generic amalgam of Medusa (<b>The Rescuers</b>), Cruella DeVille (<b>101 Dalmatians</b>), and <b>Cinderella</b>'s wicked stepmother. And her sidekick, Benjamin, is a bland underdeveloped manatee too often blending into the background (belying an otherwise fun performance by Jeff Bennett). But Ariel, Flounder, Sebastian, and King Triton remain true to established form.</p>
<p><p style="text-align: center"><img src="/images/reviewpics/ariel03.jpg" alt="the little mermaid" /></p></p>
<p>The DTS and Dolby 5.1 audio mixes are nothing special, given that the film is extremely dialogue driven. There's little in the way of ambient effects and Dooley's score is rather forgettable. Even the depth of character voice placement in this vast undersea world seems lacking.</p>
<p>In terms of bonus materials, the selection is fairly pedestrian. A behind the scenes featurette on director Peggy Holmes, two deleted scenes, an interactive games to determine which of Ariel's sisters you are most like, and a sing along option do nothing to truly enhance the experience. The only real value is a brief behind the scenes look at <b>The Little Mermaid on Broadway</b>, hosted by its Ariel, Sierra Boggess.</p>

<h1>Closing Statement</h1>
<p>Focusing solely on the character development of Ariel and her father, this heartfelt tale is worth 77 minutes of your time. Everything else is water weight.</p>

<h1>The Verdict</h1>
<p>A pleasant day at the beach.</p>
]]>
</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Married Life</title>
<link>http://www.dvdverdict.com/reviews/marriedlife.php</link>
<dc:date>2008-08-27</dc:date>
<dc:contributor>Clark Douglas</dc:contributor>
<description>
<![CDATA[

<h1>The Charge</h1>
<p>Do you know what really goes on in the mind of the person with whom you sleep?</p>

<h1>Opening Statement</h1>
<p>&quot;I don't know what I'd do if you ever left me.&quot;</p>

<h1>Facts of the Case</h1>
<p>Harry (Chris Cooper, <b>Breach</b>) is a good man. The year is 1949, and Harry is a successful businessman who is respected by his peers. He is kind, considerate, and polite. Harry is married to Pat (Patricia Clarkson, <b>Far From Heaven</b>), who is a loving and affectionate wife who seems to be particularly dependent on Harry. However, Harry thinks he has fallen in love with another woman. The woman is named Kay (Rachel McAdams, <b>Red Eye</b>), a beautiful young blonde. However, Harry is torn apart inside. He loves Kay, but he doesn't want to hurt Pat's feelings.</p>
<p>Harry's best friend is Richard (Pierce Brosnan, <b>The Matador</b>), a wolfish fellow who has a tendency to change girlfriends every two weeks. Harry tells Richard of his dilemma and finally asserts that he is going to leave Pat and marry Kay. Richard is a little skeptical of Harry's plan but takes an aggressive stand against it when he meets Kay. Richard thinks Kay is an absolutely wonderful woman and begins attempting to think of a way to have her for himself.</p>
<p>Harry tries to tell Pat of his plans, but when she has an emotional breakdown, he quickly reassures her that she must have misunderstood him. He simply can't bear the thought of hurting poor Pat, but he has to find a way to be with Kay. Suddenly, the perfect solution hits him. He'll murder Pat. He'll find a way to do it simply, a way that won't cause any mental or physical anguish. It will be best for everyone, he reasons. Will Harry pull off this &quot;mercy killing,&quot; or change his mind before he takes the life of his loving wife?</p>

<h1>The Evidence</h1>
<p>This film is right up my alley. <b>Married Life</b> supplies an intoxicating cocktail of elegant wit, Douglas Sirk-inspired melodrama, and Hitchcockian suspense filtered through the particularly snappy costume and set design of the late 1940s. Regardless of what you think of the film itself, it's simply wonderful to look at. I'm not sure that 1949 always looked like what is presented in this film, but surely sometimes it did, and <b>Married Life</b> captures the era at its sharpest. Well-dressed men and women sit around in well-furnished rooms and smoke cigarettes. I don't smoke, and I don't approve of smoking, but I love cigarettes in the movies. It is a prop that an actor can use in so many ways to say something without actually speaking. Additionally, cigarettes provide that wonderful smoky haze that adds a terrific sense of atmosphere to a room.</p>
<p>Enough about that. What about the film itself? <b>Married Life</b> is an engaging and well-crafted character study that mixes comedy and suspense quite nicely, with a whiff of melancholy hanging over everything. The film isn't quite as tightly crafted as a Hitchcock suspense flick (not many movies are), but it does seem a little warmer than your average Hitchcock film. The people in this film are all sympathetic characters, even the potentially murderous Harry. They all have secrets, they all make mistakes, but we understand why they feel the way they do. The movie is billed as a comedy, but most of the laughs here are the sort of nervously uncomfortable laughs that come when you catch someone you know doing something embarrassing. The film is funny, but don't see it if you're looking for a good time. The movie is likely to provide more fingernail-biting than giggling.</p>
<p>The characters are refreshingly complex, and the relationships between them are not as simple as we expect. Yes, Harry has fallen in love with a younger and prettier woman. However, he's not in it for the sex. In fact, we never see a single sexual encounter between the two of them. He's in the relationship because Kay provides him with doting affection, which he so craves. Though Pat is a very nice woman, she feels that the only way to express love is through sex, and Harry disagrees. Meanwhile, Kay is enthusiastic about the idea of &quot;nursing Harry to happiness,&quot; but she has her own physical cravings, which Richard is more than eager to fulfill. That's only the beginning; these characters are spun through a series of developments that are both surprising and believable.</p>
<p>The four key performances are all excellent. Chris Cooper is always good, and here he turns in yet another perfectly defined character. Somehow, he manages to convince us that Harry really is planning to murder Pat out of the goodness of his heart. Patricia Clarkson stands right alongside Joan Allen as one of the actresses who has mastered the art of playing simple characters who have something bubbling below the surface, and does so again here. Pierce Brosnan continues to re-invent himself in his post-Bond years, and here turns in a performance that ranks alongside his best work in <b>The Matador</b> and <b>The Tailor of Panama</b>. If there's a weak link, it's Rachel McAdams as Kay, who doesn't quite manage to seem as well-developed as the other characters. Still, this is tough competition, and McAdams does a decent enough job with the part.</p>
<p>The transfer looks pretty clean and sharp, with reasonably deep blacks and well-balanced colors. Sound is fine, with Dickon Hinchliffe's champagne-smooth score coming through nice and clear. Extras include a solid commentary track with director Ira Sachs and three alternate endings. Wow, are they alternate endings. The first ending runs ten minutes and essentially throws these characters into a compressed version of the third act from <b>Million Dollar Baby</b>. I'm not joking. It's every bit as bad as it sounds, thank goodness they cut it out. The second runs seven minutes, and is just a slightly shorter version of the <b>Million Dollar Baby</b> ending. Finally, we have a two-minute alternate ending, which is okay. The actual ending of the movie is far superior to any of these three.</p>

<h1>The Rebuttal Witnesses</h1>
<p>Some viewers may grow frustrated by the fact that the film does not commit itself more wholeheartedly to a particular tone. It includes elements of Sirk melodrama, but doesn't take them too far. It offers plenty of Hitchcock-style suspense, but is frequently relieving your nerves with bits of light humor along the way. I think the movie works nicely as it is, but I imagine some viewers will become a little exasperated with it's refusal to plunge full-speed into any particular area.</p>

<h1>Closing Statement</h1>
<p><b>Married Life</b> is an above-average character study that boasts some very fine acting and an intelligent script. It's an easy recommendation.</p>

<h1>The Verdict</h1>
<p>Not guilty.</p>
]]>
</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>My Sassy Girl</title>
<link>http://www.dvdverdict.com/reviews/mysassygirl.php</link>
<dc:date>2008-08-27</dc:date>
<dc:contributor>Joel Pearce</dc:contributor>
<description>
<![CDATA[

<h1>The Charge</h1>
<p>She's beautiful, smart, funny and TOTALLY CRAZY.</p>

<h1>The Case</h1>
<p>Dear Fox,</p>
<p>While this may seem sudden to you, this letter has been a long time coming. I've been trying to put it off, hoping that things would eventually start to get better again. They haven't, though, and I realize now that I can't ignore these problems anymore.</p>
<p>Please, don't get me wrong. You were my first love, and I'll never forget the wonderful times we had together. You brought me <b>Star Wars</b> at a crucial time in my life, and it changed everything for me. I remember the summer that <b>Independence Day</b> came out. I thought it was the coolest thing ever at the time, and I really believed that we'd be together forever. We had so many great times together: watching <i>The Simpsons</i> and <i>Buffy</i>, curled up together on the couch in my parents' basement watching <i>The X-Files</i> in the dark...I knew then that I had found the one I wanted to be with forever.</p>
<p>Lately, though, you've started to change, and it's even getting hard to recognize you as the studio that I once loved. It really hurt when you cancelled <i>Firefly</i>, and then last year you didn't even give <b>Drive</b> a chance. Now, there's all of these rumours about <b>Watchmen</b> getting shut down over an underhanded lawsuit, and I'm starting to wonder if you really care about me at all. You used to be one of the most daring, sexy studios in Hollywood, but it's been a long time since you've brought anything exciting to our relationship. Over the past few years, it's all about safe bets that don't turn out that well, repeats of the same movies over and over again.</p>
<p>And now, here I am, holding the screener for <b>My Sassy Girl</b> in my hand, and so much about our relationship has come into focus. You know full well how much this movie means to me. The original is the best romantic comedy ever made, and I've been begging for an American release for years. Instead, you made this remake, and it's one of the harshest betrayals I've ever experienced. It's also made me realize a number of things about our own collapsing relationship.</p>
<p>The story of <b>My Sassy Girl</b> is a little too much like what I've been going through with you. This really nice innocent guy named Charlie (Jesse Bradford, <b>Swimfan</b>) gets completely steamrolled by this attractive but troubled girl named Jordan (Elisha Cuthbert, <b>House of Wax</b>). He takes care of her when she passes out drunk at a subway station, which starts up their rocky romance. While she mostly treats him like crap, he falls hopelessly in love with her anyway, and she puts him through a lot of pain and suffering.</p>
<p>The best thing I can say about the remake is how close the script conforms to the original. Many scenes are transcribed almost exactly from the original film, including a number of things that I didn't expect would be left in the remake. Unfortunately, <b>My Sassy Girl</b> isn't really a remake of the 2001 film, so much as it is a remake of the translated script. While much of the dialogue remains intact, I'm convinced that director Yann Samuell (<b>Love Me If You Dare</b>) and the cast never actually watched the original film, or didn't entirely understand it. The original is extremely funny and deeply touching, but neither of those characteristics translates to your version.</p>
<p>The biggest problem? The titular character isn't especially sassy. In the original, the girl rips across the screen like a whirlwind. We totally understand why Gyun-woo would want to be with her, even though she beats him up and controls his life. Here, Cuthbert just fizzles as an annoying drunk. It makes no sense that Charlie would want to be with her, and her lack of spunk makes her more like a yippy Yorkshire terrier than Ji-hyun Jun's Tasmanian devil. Add to that an annoying sidekick that wasn't in the original, poorly delivered dialogue and pacing that demonstrates a near shocking level of ineptitude, and I can say pretty confidently that this signals the end between us.</p>
<p>Maybe you'll claim that it's unfair to judge this movie solely on how it compares to the original, which most people in North America haven't seen. To that charge, I counter that it could be seen by more people if it would actually get released here, and that I would have even preferred to see a dub of the original to this bottom-of-the-barrel remake. And you know how I feel about dubs. Ultimately, the remake of <b>My Sassy Girl</b> shows just what you've turned into. You lack the courage to take a risk on the original, so you set up a by-the-numbers remake that you know will be successful. When the Asian remake craze wears off before production begins, you don't even take <i>that</i> risk, instead tossing it to a second-rate production team and slipping it out on DVD, hoping that fans of the original won't notice what you've done. This, from the studio that once took a risk on <b>Star Wars</b> and <b>Alien</b>, who released <b>Fight Club</b> into the mainstream market.</p>
<p>So that's why it's over. I really don't like who you've become, and even though I will always remember the wonderful times we had in the past, all the feelings I have for you are gone now. I've been hurt by you too many times to blindly put my faith in you anymore, and I'm breaking this off before I get hurt again. I know it's going to be hard to avoid you completely, so I hope that we'll still be able to be friends. These recent events are going to be hard to forgive, though, so you'll need to be patient with me as these wounds heal.</p>
<p>In the meantime, I'm going to be listening to Beck's <i>Sea Change</i>, eating frozen yoghurt, and watching <b>Buffy</b> Season 3, just to hang onto how great things used to be.</p>
<p>Goodbye, Fox. I'm ready to move on, and I hope you will too.</p>
<p>Sincerely (but not affectionately),<br /> Joel Pearce</p>
]]>
</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>The Nightmare Before Christmas (Blu-Ray)</title>
<link>http://www.dvdverdict.com/reviews/nightmareb4bd.php</link>
<dc:date>2008-08-27</dc:date>
<dc:contributor>Michael Stailey</dc:contributor>
<description>
<![CDATA[

<h1>The Charge</h1>
<p>Eureka! This year, Christmas will be OURS!!!</p>

<h1>The Case</h1>
<p>The giddy childlike innocence so prevalent within me on opening night -- Oct 29, 1993 -- is still very much alive today, 15 years later. A visit to Walt Disney World in November '93 gave me the opportunity to spend more than an hour exploring the film's many puppets and sets on display in the backlot of the then Disney/MGM studios. And just last year, during a tour of Disney's Animation Research Library in Glendale, CA, I came face to face once again with many of the original puppets and maquettes carefully stored in the Disney vaults. So, as you can imagine, the anticipation I had for this Blu-ray release was just as great as the Special Edition DVD, which coincidentally was the first film I ever saw on the format...and neither of them have disappointed.</p>
<p>With each subsequent evolution, <b>The Nightmare Before Christmas</b> becomes more and more entrenched as one of the greatest animated musicals of all time. And while the official title remains &quot;Tim Burton's The Nightmare Before Christmas,&quot; this film owes as much, if not more to Danny Elfman and Henry Selick, as it does Tim's creative genius. While Tim's attention was divided between two or three other projects, the heart and soul of <b>Nightmare</b> belonged to Danny's passionately introspective songs and Henry's oh so green foray into the most ambitious stop-motion animation project ever conceived. In their own way, both of these men are Jack Skellington; exceptionally gifted artists in their own right (Danny with Boingo, Henry as an animator), each went looking for something more from life and ended up blazing new trails for themselves, opening doors they didn't even know were there.</p>
<p>But I digress. The history of the film and analysis of its many production nuances have been covered exceptionally well by my former business partner and predecessor Chief Justice Mike Jackson, in his reviews of the two original DVD releases. So let's focus on the many new wrinkles revealed in this highly anticipated BD release.</p>
<p>As you know, two years ago, <b>Nightmare</b> was given the Disney Digital 3-D treatment. Sure retrofit multi-dimensional enhancement was interesting, but it was the clarity of the image and depth of detail that made this presentation shine. For the first time, we could almost feel the Edward Gorey-inspired textures of Deane Taylor, Barry Jackson, and Gregg Olsson's magically delicious sets. And while impressive on the big screen, having that level of detail up close and personal in your living room, juices the film's already intense emotional imagery. From the water marks on the windows of Jack's tower laboratory to the frayed threads on Sally's dress, from the Seussical Christmas Town to Oogie's whacked out torture chamber, every scene oozes with new discoveries and I don't think I'll ever get bored letting my eyes roam around the frame.</p>
<p>Beyond the picture, <b>Nightmare</b> benefits tremendously from a 7.1 Dolby mix that will rock your home theatre with more Danny Elfman/Steve Bartek goodness ever thought possible. In group numbers like &quot;This is Halloween&quot; and &quot;Making Christmas,&quot; the ensemble envelopes you like theatre in the round. In most cases, a surround mix leverages the ambient environmental effects, but here it's the vocals that make all the difference in the world. When many of these characters are offscreen, their presence remains; so much so, that their absence is palpable during Jack's pondering monologues and other quiet two or three-character interactions. Kudos to the audio team for painting an even broader landscape.</p>
<p>The other important facet of this release are the bonus materials. There are no BD-exclusives, but Disney and <b>Nightmare</b> fans have several reasons to cheer. First and foremost is a tri-level commentary track, and while I generally despise commentaries hacked together from different sources, having Henry, Tim, and Danny all sharing their thoughts and insights is a very welcome addition. Danny's is the closest to a true audio commentary, right down to the many cases of him saying &quot;Wait, here it comes...&quot; and then singing along or recalling truly personal memories. It's a joy to listen to, deserving of an isolated track all its own. Tim and Henry are a bit drier, but like parents at their child's high school graduation, both share deep personal feelings for the film and its birthing process. All three have had 15 years to ruminate on their respective experiences and do so by wearing their hearts on their sleeves throughout. Completists will be distressed by the absence of Henry's and cinematographer Pete Kozachik's audio commentary for the Special Edition DVD, but you had to expect that something would get left out along the way. It is Disney, after all.</p>
<p>The other two new additions are an animated version of Tim's original poem, &quot;The Nightmare Before Christmas,&quot; envisioned through his original sketches and narrated by the one and only Christopher Lee; and the greatest treat a Disney theme park geek could ask for -- a full walk through and an exceptional 38-minute behind the scenes making of Disneyland's &quot;Haunted Mansion Holiday.&quot; For those who have never had the pleasure of experiencing this holiday treat, the unique walk through perspective gives you a chance to see a bit more than riders normally would from their Doom Buggy. Yes, I could have done without some of the wacky handheld camera movements, but listening to that wonderful holiday soundtrack and Corey Burton's narrative homage to great Paul Frees makes me look even more forward to the attraction's late September debut at the Magic Kingdom. An optional trivia track distills even more info about the Mansion's history, with some info even I didn't know, like the holiday pyramid in the load area serves as an advent calendar in which a new box is opened during each week of the Holiday Mansion's 13 week run, and that more than 10 million people travel through the attraction each year.</p>
<p>Okay, easing out of geek mode, the remainder of the bonus features are ported over from the Special Edition release. Tim does provide brief intros for each of his short films: <b>Vincent</b> (1982) -- a tribute to the late Vincent Price, as narrated by the legend himself; and <b>Frankenweenie</b> (1984), in which Tim provides a quick update on pre-production and character sketches for his full-length stop motion adaptation. What I never realized is that Sofia Coppola played Victor's exercise-loving and freakishly tall neighbor Anne Chambers, credited as Domino in the film. That must have been her stripper name. I kid. More <b>Nightmare</b> ports include a making of documentary (in which Pixar's Joe Ranft appears), deleted animation sequences, storyboards, production design galleries, a storyboard to film comparison, lobby posters, and original theatrical trailers. And, last but not least, the much heralded digital copy of the film, which is quickly becoming the industry anti-piracy standard for new releases.</p>
<p>Save for the one sole omission, there's little complaint to be had with <b>The Nightmare Before Christmas [Blu-ray]</b>. Its attention to detail has earned the film a proud place alongside <b>Blade Runner: Complete Collector's Edition [Blu-ray]</b> and <b>Transformers [HD DVD]<